|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
SGC would most likely grade the Clemente RC a 2.5....But, yeah I guess it's all about who's submitting the cards.
This Mantle sold for a premium not too long ago. I was actually surprised it sold. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
No issue at all with minor paper loss on the back. The front is a different story, but I seek out cards like this honestly for the value.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Same. Great looking Clemente.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Absolutely not at the least, and tiny speck of paper loss.
I would absolutely buy and may pay strong for and example of a card like described for the PC. Sometimes the significance of the front outweighs the back issues.
__________________
Andrew Member since 2009 |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Half the cards in my collection look like that. I love the discount I get for a little bit of paper loss. And since I'm not an investor, I can accept the fact that the card will appreciate at a lower rate than a high grade example.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
It depends on your intent and budget. That is a great looking card. The front is terrific. And that card is famous/desirable for the front. So, if it’s for your collection and you cannot afford or do not want to pay for a 5, this is a great alternative. However, if you are buying it for resale or you can buy a 5, don’t buy it and buy the 5.
Regardless, it is a great looking card |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
I have been a Net 54 member since 2009 and have an Ebay store since 1998 https://www.ebay.com/usr/favorite_things Cards for sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185900663@N07/albums I am actively buying and selling vintage sports cards graded and raw. Feedback as a buyer: https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=297262 I am accepting select private consignments of quality vintage cards (raw or graded) and collecting "want" lists for higher end ($1K+) vintage cards. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
^^This.^^
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I’ll take it.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
The paper loss itself is no worse than moderate, but it's a fairly significant area of damage if you include the surrounding stain. Still, with front as nice as that, I'd probably go as high as whatever the PSA 3 VCP average is.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't mind paper loss on the back if the front looks nice. I'd definitely pay a premium on that '55 Topps Clemente. Love high eye-appeal cards with a lower technical grade.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA and Paper Loss | here2havefun | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 12-23-2020 02:46 PM |
| Did SGC miss the paper loss? | sportscardpete | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 10-21-2012 12:28 AM |
| PSA 5 with paper loss? | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 52 | 01-05-2012 07:34 PM |
| fixing paper loss...or not | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-18-2007 06:17 PM |
| paper loss | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-30-2006 03:09 AM |