|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Very interesting that Joe jackson name has not been mentioned his cards having been on a huge upswing and now his 1915 CJ Joe Jackson are really starting to jump and his m101-4 and 5 have steadily gone up over last 2 plus years
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, good point. Besides Ruth, I think a strong place to go would be Cobb and Shoeless CJs.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
You beat me by an hour, Jeff! Joe Jackson is a great call. And Eric Perry,
I am with you! Trent King |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've been going to a few local shows the last 6 months it seems like Jackie Robinson has gained a ton of interest.
John |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Ben "I love baseball history backstory; especially when it involves cards." Last edited by benge610; 04-10-2022 at 12:46 PM. Reason: ttypo, ugh. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am happy with this Gehrig. Hope to add a few more like Cobb, Jackson, Wagner and Plank. Always wanted a Jackson RC. Would like a well presented A at some point.
__________________
Andrew Member since 2009 |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
My 2 cents - The best you can afford with very nice eye appeal:
T206 Cobb's (but not the red - too many) Exhibits Ruth & Gehrig 1941 Playball Ted Williams 1960's Aaron & Mays in PSA 9 1970's Nolan Ryan in PSA 9 Those would be high up on the want-list with some headroom to grow. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am sure this has been discussed before, but I am curious why Ted Williams always gets left off the list of most important "vintage" ballplayers. Clemente/Jackie make sense from a cultural perspective, and obviously Ruth, Gehrig, Cobb and Wagner are pre-war titans. But, how is Ted Williams not part of the Aaron, Mays, Mantle level? It is not one or two omissions, he is consistently on a lower tier when I have seen folks listing the best player cards by era (whereas, he is almost always Top 10 by baseball analysts compiling "best of" lists). As someone newer to vintage collecting than many of the long-timers here, I am wondering why his performance is viewed as less significant than his contemporaries in the 40s-50s.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
1) He did not play for a New York team. 2) He did not set, nor still holds, what many may consider as a significant all-time MLB record. 3) He was not the first/only one ever in MLB to set, achieve, or perform some significant mark, goal, or event. He is the last player to hit .400, but he wasn't the first. He is the only player (that I know of) to literally miss almost 5 full seasons of MLB because of military service, which doesn't really count as a baseball related stat in people's minds. And yet, it is because of his military service that he likely missed out on setting, and still holding, some all-time MLB records. Had Williams not missed those 5 years for military service, and instead had 5 average Ted Williams years, he would very likely also be the current all-time MLB recordholder for RBIs and Runs Scored, and possibly for all-time Walks as well. And it probably would have boosted him, at least at some point in time, into the top 5/10 all-time category for some other batting records as well, including second all-time in HRs behind only Ruth, until Aaron would eventually pass him years later. And this is all in addition to the one all-time batting record he does hold for OBP. But for some reason fans don't seem to think of OBP as highly as they do RBIs, Runs Scored, and HRs. It is also possible he may have batted .400 for a season at least one more time as well, or who knows what else had he been able to play those 5 lost years. So, he does seem to get downplayed/forgotten a bit in relation to the other star players mentioned, and military service and not playing for a team in the right media market are likely big contributing factors as to why. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Picked this one up a while back. I think signed vintage also has plenty of room to grow if looking for an investment opportunity.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Signed vintage hof names, signed HOF rcs and signed HOF hopefuls.
When you see 5 or 6 of the same card offered in one auction, it has to make one think about the supply aspect. People are selling in droves, buying from an auction and selling 6 months later or sooner. Irrational exuberance and no sign of prudence or reliance on past sales. For years, the 2 most plentiful sets in every auction were t206 and 33 goudeys by the truckload. Plus people always saved the "good players"
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I’m curious to hear thoughts on this as well, I was surprised to see his play ball rookie not included on more lists |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great card Jesse!
In addition to what others have said, Williams never won a championship, and other than a brief run in the late 1940s/early 1950s was stuck on second division teams his whole career. It wasn’t his fault; the Red Sox were terrible at developing pitchers (some things never change) but he still gets dinged for it.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
The play ball seems to be a hot card. My two cents is that it seems that he has a lack of great cards issued in his early days. Side note: Ted and Joe D are high up on most people’s list of best players of all time but they may both suffer from being considered a bit surly. Neither seemed to have the charisma of a ruth or mantle. Could be way off here.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
In Williams' case, I left him off due to his lack of a World Series ring. He was a great player and an otherworldly hitter; however, Williams never got to the top of the mountain. I have similar feelings regarding every perennial All-Star with barren fingers. There are posters who will likely attack this point of view and cite numerous reasons why "championships don't matter" in baseball. Ultimately, though, winning the World Series does matter...as it pertains to being an upper-echelon, top-tier player.
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (136/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (198/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
How many World Series did Ty Cobb win?
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
A low-end one of these. (pictured card is not mine)
__________________
Baseball cards will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no baseball cards.--The Fabulous Furry Freak Bros. (paraphrased) Last edited by riggs336; 04-29-2022 at 07:50 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My GMA Experiment | Pilot172000 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 43 | 03-10-2021 08:45 AM |
| 100 experiment | cardsnstuff | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 05-29-2016 02:56 PM |
| My PSA Experiment | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 59 | 05-01-2008 07:17 PM |
| My experiment on the BST | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 03-03-2007 05:24 PM |
| An experiment with PRO | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 01-05-2003 03:26 AM |