 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
06-12-2022, 08:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 06-12-2022 at 08:54 PM. Reason: Missed a word 
|
|
#3
06-12-2022, 09:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
These are the other combos I currently have consisting of three or more cards. I will have to do them one at a time to avoid confusion.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#4
06-12-2022, 09:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The third one.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#5
06-12-2022, 09:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The fourth one.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#6
07-02-2022, 03:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#7
07-02-2022, 05:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#8
07-02-2022, 06:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I forgot I had this miscut, Santiago is above a Manager card, a Rookie Stars card, or a multi player card at some point on the two Slits.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#10
07-18-2022, 11:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 07-24-2022 at 04:00 PM. Reason: Double word
|
|
#11
07-23-2022, 02:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's a link to a post I made on the B/S/T thread - looking for one version of the 7th series checklist. Dean's has it at a good price but it's way too o/c and angled for even my usually liberal standards. Figure with all the chatter on this topic someone may have an extra....thanks!
https://net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=322542
|
|
#12
07-23-2022, 09:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
These back miscuts are the only way this Series might ever be figured out, John Werhas is to the right of Ralph Houk on a probable 3x Row.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#13
06-12-2022, 09:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is the first one again since this thread flipped to page 2.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#14
06-15-2022, 05:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
With the arrangement of multiple rows, which we know differs from slit to slit, can we be certain that, in this case, Menke was ever under Wagner and over Coombs on the same slit? It could have been, but all we know for sure is that at least on one slit he was under Wagner, and at least on one he was over Coombs, no? Know what I mean?
|
|
#15
06-15-2022, 06:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#16
06-15-2022, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
To establish the 11 card rows, we need pretty much every card miscut.
To establish the vertical order of the rows on top of each other, if we know the 11 card rows, we only need a few miscuts to show which rows appeared over which other rows, because the rows never change, even though it won't be the same on both half sheets. We'll probably never know which half sheet is which without a sheet discovery, but this should be doable like the 66 highs with enough patience. Unfortunately this series appears to have been well-cut by Topps standards. I am striking out finding more. I have not been able to turn up even a 2 card panel from this series digging through auction archives. I sent this link to the Topps collectors I know who don't post online and got nothing there either. Still digging... It would be really cool to be able to correctly ID the relative print quantities of every vintage Topps card eventually.
|
|
#17
06-15-2022, 10:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here are the two cards known in the Series to be above a Checklist, the Ribant is no doubt above the Marichal 6th Series Checklist and the Campbell appears to also be above the Marichal 6th Series Checklist.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#18
06-15-2022, 10:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark, this is all I have for you. I have had these since '67, so I could have pulled these two from the same pack. I checked all my backs but they are no help.
497 Campbell 523 Merritt
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| f/s 1967 TOPPS #51 ASTROS ROOKIE STARS,1967 TOPPS #167 SENATORS ROOKIES | megalimey | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-29-2020 10:51 AM |
| CLOSED: 1967 Topps 400+ Cards - Series 1-6: ENDS 2NITE Mon 6/12 | Paul S | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 7 | 06-12-2017 09:27 PM |
| FS: 1967 Low Number Series Near Complete Set | ynnek4 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 17 | 09-25-2015 02:08 PM |
| WTTF: 1967 Topps & 1972 Topps High Numbers - have 1967's and HOFers to trade | GehrigFan | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 06-14-2015 03:09 PM |
| F/T: (3) 1967 stragglers (5th series) | SmokyBurgess | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-16-2011 08:46 AM |
Hybrid Mode
