![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Completely agree.
__________________
James Ingram Successful net54 purchases from/trades with: Tere1071 (twice), Bocabirdman (5 times), 8thEastVB, GoldenAge50s, IronHorse2130, Kris19 (twice), G1911, dacubfan, sflayank, Smanzari, bocca001, eliminator, ejstel, lampertb, rjackson44 (twice), Jason19th, Cmvorce, CobbSpikedMe, Harliduck, donmuth, HercDriver, Huck, theshleps, horzverti, ALBB, lrush |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Generally it's big sellers being lazy or small sellers hiding something, is my experience. I am sure there are many instances the other way too but those are my thoughts.
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've seen this lately even with pricey graded vintage on eBay. I guess the assumption is that if there is a grade on the slab, that's enough to infer what quality the back is or is not, even without seeing it. Yes - lazy.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all- I'll start by saying I don't sell cards on ebay, which seems to be the
focus thus far. I do discuss cards privately with many on this site, which includes transmitted images. I live rurally and don't have lightning-fast internet speeds. I also tend to send fairly lengthy lists of cards. I leave it up to the other person to indicate interest based on the list, then will transmit images depending on their level of interest. I can say for sure that I have never- and that's literal, meaning not once- failed to provide any image because I had "something to hide". Laziness? Since I'm frequently the initiator of card talks, I think that word doesn't fit either. If I send a net54 member a list of 15 cards for sale/trade, I'm not going to greatly increase the workload by including 30 pictures (front and back) for a member who might reply that they have no interest in any on the list regardless of pictures. Should that person tell me they want images of cards "x,y, and z", then I provide them happily. Context is key. Now, if an interested collector asks for images and the holder doesn't provide them, that's a red flag. Again, the context tells the story. Trent King |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My favorite is when a card with a back variation is listed, even mentioning the variation in the title. Yet no back scan is provided.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And it also bugs me when the card shown has a back scan and shows a print variation I'm looking for but then I see the photo is a "stock" photo and not the actual card you will receive. A few times I asked if I could get the exact card shown but I usually don't recieve a response. Mike |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
too many sellers on ebay offer no descriptions and do not point out flaws (front or back) that cannot be seen on the scans or pictures provided, most of which are mediocre to poor...I stay away from these sellers unless I know them or they have respond to my ebay messages/questions, many of whom do not do that either
Bruce Perry |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A little disappointment rant | lug-nut | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 76 | 08-19-2015 04:59 PM |
Brief Rant | 4k6 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-21-2012 12:07 PM |
Another BCS rant | pariah1107 | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 23 | 01-10-2012 02:02 PM |
VCP rant | vintagetoppsguy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 10-31-2011 11:14 AM |
my rant of the day | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-19-2001 05:31 PM |