|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, yes and no. No one expects perfection and errors like the Ripken or 'Alomar' are just errors. But misidentifying cards completely, misidentifying sets, refusing to accept new research, that's just negligence or arrogance. For years, PSA refused to acknowledge the existence of a T220 Silver Border Donovan. Joe O's rationale: we haven't graded one so if we add it to the checklist no one will be able to complete a PSA-graded set. Yeah, that made sense. Ignore the facts you don't like.
They don't have to be perfect, but they do have to try.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 07-11-2022 at 10:58 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Grading companies marking cards. | Flintboy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-25-2019 07:17 AM |
| Question on submitting cards to grading companies | Cardboard_Mike | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 02-24-2019 09:07 AM |
| How are the grading companies doing? | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 01-26-2015 09:24 AM |
| Talk about PSA grading cards wrong, whats up with... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-20-2006 09:26 PM |
| What's wrong with photo cards grading standards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-29-2005 10:16 PM |