NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Football Cards Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-19-2022, 11:03 PM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 3,112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911 View Post
You know sheets much better than I - do you have any ideas on what these lines are? The 72 footballs, these you've found, the 73 Weaver strip from the baseball thread. These seem to be placed wrong to be cutting lines, as they are not where a properly centered card would be cut. I'm not sure why some minority of issued sheets would place lines like this where they are not 'hidden' in the issued product, in only some years.
I don't think any of those particular stray errant lines served any purpose, I think it was just sloppiness on the part of Topps of not removing them before printing the sheets.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-20-2022, 06:11 PM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,524
Default

I haven't seen another one yet, but Suggs here is doused in yellow, over most of the background, the uniform and his person.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1634.jpg (185.7 KB, 508 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-21-2022, 12:11 AM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,524
Default

Hugh McElhenny comes with or without this green mark by his jersey number. The defect version is not difficult.

Topps really could have found a picture where his eyes aren't closed.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Hugh-McElhenny.jpg (46.2 KB, 507 views)
File Type: jpg Hugh-McElhenny-1.jpg (45.7 KB, 503 views)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-21-2022, 06:55 AM
jefferyepayne jefferyepayne is offline
Jeff P
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,094
Default

Lots of great print defects in this thread! Keep'em coming.

jeff
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-30-2022, 09:43 PM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,524
Default

Walt Sweeney in the 1965 Topps set, card 173, comes with or without this partial line and full line beneath it on the bottom of his card. It does not appear to be cutting line visible from being off-center, but a stray mark or something.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1681.jpg (171.3 KB, 484 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-11-2022, 11:15 PM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,524
Default

1966 Topps Gary Cutsinger #52 comes with or without this frame gap around the team logo on back. The cream back comes both ways; I haven't seen it on a white back yet but I haven't looked hard.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Gary-Cutsinger.jpg (57.4 KB, 471 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-11-2022, 11:28 PM
G1911 G1911 is offline
Gr.eg McCl.@y
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,524
Default

And this one is a true variation that I believe has never been mentioned online. Galen Fiss 1963 Topps card #21 had a cut above his eye removed.

His Purple sky card can be found with the cut above his eye present, and the bruising beneath his eye more severe.

The Purple sky card was then adjusted to reduce the bruising and remove the cut above his eye.

The regular version of the card with a proper, blue sky has the cut removed and the bruising beneath reduced further.

The version with the full cut is, I think at this point, pretty difficult.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1773.jpg (181.8 KB, 475 views)
File Type: jpg Galen-Fiss.jpg (42.2 KB, 471 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600.jpg (42.8 KB, 472 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Show...me...your print variations! 4reals Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 3130 Yesterday 12:43 PM
Error variations vs. Print Variations: 1990 Fleer Martinez deweyinthehall Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) 19 01-20-2025 04:51 PM
FS: Topps Print Variations 4reals 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T 0 05-10-2020 01:33 PM
Are these variations or print defects? savedfrommyspokes Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 16 02-09-2013 12:52 PM
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) shammus Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 09-03-2010 08:58 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:56 AM.


ebay GSB