Little help requested - 1913 Tom Barker “Honus Wagner”?

[BobC]

Originally Posted by Brian Van Horn

Not Wagner. Build and facial structure nowhere close.

That definitely looks to be a "mechanical" TPG error where someone got the wrong flip in the holder. Obviously, someone was not paying attention when this one went out to the door. There is one other "in action" card from these game sets that is pretty much agreed upon as being Cobb sliding. But have never heard anyone ever claim that Wagner was in any of the other "in action" images. That is not Wagner!

[abothebear]

The action cards are named according to the action (with a differentiating feature if there are more than one card with the same action). This one is “batter swinging looking forward” and that is what should be on the label, even if it was Wagner in the picture. So I agree with the previous comment that they must have stuck the wrong label in there.

[brianp-beme]

Here is a great example of a Honus Wagner batting card (E300 Plow's Candy) for comparison. So the Barker card is obviously not Wagnerian in nature.

Brian (card not mine)

[BioCRN]

Originally Posted by BobC

That definitely looks to be a "mechanical" TPG error where someone got the wrong flip in the holder. Obviously, someone was not paying attention when this one went out to the door. There is one other "in action" card from these game sets that is pretty much agreed upon as being Cobb sliding. But have never heard anyone ever claim that Wagner was in any of the other "in action" images. That is not Wagner!

It is a flip error. PSA calls this one "Batter Swinging - Looking Forward"

[Belfast1933]

Originally Posted by BioCRN

It is a flip error. PSA calls this one "Batter Swinging - Looking Forward"

Damn… knew it was too too to be true

[Casey2296]

Originally Posted by Belfast1933

Damn… knew it was too too to be true

Maybe its the great Heine Wagner..
_

[Belfast1933]

Originally Posted by casey2296

maybe its the great heine wagner..
_

🤞