|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the info and the link Al.
Nice info on that site, or bad for a variation searching junkie. ![]() Regards, Butch.
__________________
“Man proposes and God disposes.” U.S. Grant, July 1, 1885 Completed: 1969 - 2000 Topps Baseball Sets and Traded Sets. Senators and Frank Howard fan. I collect Topps baseball variations -- I can quit anytime I want to.....I DON'T WANT TO. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here are some of my black-less (as well as "black-lessing", red-less, and yellow-less) pick-ups.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On this card, there is a red slash on his right arm and a short vertical line at the top. I have one and saw three of these on COMC. All have both the slash and the line.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Good one Thomas. Not common but not hard to find
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Another 1967 Topps back read find……537 chuck estrada …….dot version?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Almost the same as 1967 topps Jim owens……dots or snakeskin
Last edited by Elberson; 08-02-2022 at 04:40 PM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
LOVE the coloring on those '71 Progressive Proofs.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thank you, Mark. Obviously, the Bando and the Fregosi appear to be "blue" only proofs. The Wine card seems to have just 3 colors lacking the black, the same as the Garvey in this thread: https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?p=1583626
As with the Garvey and Beckert card, these 3 cards have normal backs My question then is, is the Wine card simply black-less card or is it a 3-color progressive proof? If it is a 3-color progressive proof, what is the progression of the first 3 colors on the progressive proofs? My guess is that blue would be the first color as the Beckert, Bando and Fregosi cards are blue only. So, is a blue/yellow only card or a blue/red only card second in the progression after the blue only? ETA: I found my own answer: From the Dictionary of Marketing Terms: progressive proofs (progs) Set of proofs made during the four-color printing process; also called color proofs. Typically, there are seven different impressions in a set of progressive proofs: one for each color alone and then the combinations as succeeding colors are added. The final proof will show the finished color reproduction. An example of a progressive sequence follows: (1) impression of the red plate; (2) impression of the yellow plate; (3) impression of the yellow plate on the red plate; (4) impression of the blue plate; (5) impression of the blue plate on the yellow and red plate; (6) impression of the black plate; (7) impression of the black plate on the yellow, red, and blue plate. With this in mind, the Wise and Garvey cards would be #5s, while the Fregosi and Bando would be #4s. Last edited by savedfrommyspokes; 08-03-2022 at 02:01 PM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
The progression list above would explain this black only card I received with the other 3. This card is a blank backed card.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 07:05 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 12:52 PM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 05:32 PM |
| Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 08:58 PM |
| Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 08:23 PM |