![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks Jeff, great summary and i'm with you on those points.
Where i'm going with this is more on the lines of a collector viewpoint I guess, sort of ok, well I can pick up a raw Brett RC and any of his other topps base cards from 76-80 for nothing in maybe ex or nm and those are pretty easy to find with pretty low risk tbh. When the cards are that plentiful (and to be honest in the example above nm-mt is pretty common for anything other than the RC) why pay the premium for graded. I guess when I buy raw, I don't focus on the overall condition of say a 70's card as long as I feel its somewhere on the lines of "looks good". Anyway, trying to see what people thoughts are on that dotted line, where is that line where finding a 1965 Gibson in EX is so tough I'm relegated to just buying the PSA 5? Maybe there is not concrete answer, and everyone collects whatever they like but was curious what collectors on this forum think, especially those who do collect raw over graded.
__________________
Collecting: Sandy Koufax "Left Arm of God"
Last edited by gustomania; 08-10-2022 at 02:01 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Just a Rant | cammb | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-07-2022 03:00 PM |
Brief Rant | 4k6 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-21-2012 12:07 PM |
Another BCS rant | pariah1107 | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 23 | 01-10-2012 02:02 PM |
VCP rant | vintagetoppsguy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 10-31-2011 11:14 AM |
my rant of the day | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-19-2001 05:31 PM |