|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The 1 grade can cover a whole range of problems, from those that render the card a disaster to those that are more technical. Comparing yours to another 1 and saying it looks much better really isn't meaningful in this context. The flawed assumption in your post is that 1s should be roughly equivalent aesthetically so if yours looks much better than another 1, it must be graded wrong. Not so.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 09-16-2022 at 06:39 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1933 Uncle Jacks Candy | bigfish | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-18-2019 08:47 AM |
| FS: 1933 Uncle Jacks - Cuyler | markf31 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-24-2014 10:16 AM |
| Wanted: 1933 Uncle Jacks HOF Type & 1933 DeLong's | Orioles1954 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-04-2010 10:51 AM |
| FS: 1933 Uncle Jacks Bottomley (Green) and 1933 Tattoo Orbit Mack! | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 12-12-2008 02:29 PM |
| Wanted: 1933 Uncle Jacks Candy | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-15-2007 07:59 PM |