|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pujols is where he is on the RBI list because of Trout. He spent several years as a DH/1B with a below average bat but still getting RBI’s because the Angels kept him hitting behind Trout who gets on base at an absurd rate.
I don’t see how this can be argued, on reasonable factual grounds, to be false. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear God- "mountain, meet mole hill"
1) There is no conspiracy about Pujols reaching HR history. There wasn't a secret meeting of the pitcher's union in which they voted to groove pitches, so he could reach a milestone while they become answers to obscure trivia questions. 2) Albert Pujols has reached his achievements because of his OWN performance. The RBI total certainly is influenced by who bats ahead of him- as it is for every single player. He doesn't make out the lineup cards and does not control who reaches base in front of him, who the opposing pitcher is, etc. Yes, several of his Angels years were below average- for him!- as he got older. I continue to be amazed that some "fans" continue to be befuddled by the reality that the skill of most professional athletes, even great ones, diminishes with age. Google machine reveals a career average of 296 with 2000+ RBI and 700+ HR. He's Mickey Mantle with 175 more HR and 500+ more RBI (and save it, I know they played different positions and different amounts of seasons- point is he's been a killer player). 3) The problem with dissecting something is that it's dead when you're done. Give it a rest! Trent King |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Now draft kings has a partnership with ESPN.
Expect the unexpected!
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pujols years were not below average “for him”, he has been below league average offense for several years. More if you’re only looking at 1B and DH. “Google machine” will turn this data up as well.
RBI totals are not really the product of individual performance. Pujols got a great gift in Trout. Many, even most, milestones and records have been aided by favorable circumstances. Such is reality. Pujols is a legendary player, a first ballot of famer, and my bias leans towards his favor. But dismissing a rather unlikely event of several pitchers non conspiratorially juicing him balls repeatedly with runners on base can be done without insisting on things that are plainly false. People love to just take the most opposite argument possible instead of actually staying within the bounds of evidence and reason. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The fix was in, but it couldn't happen to a nicer guy.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I will grant that it's hard to fathom a plot, but at the same time it's just hard to accept that in the natural course of things, a 45 year old or whatever he is who has been pretty bad for a long time comes up with a 9 HR 27 RBI month and finishes with 9 RBI in four games when he just happens to be chasing HR and RBI milestones. That's all I have to say about it. Good discussion, good points raised.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 10-09-2022 at 12:01 PM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
1911-
"People love to just take the most opposite argument possible instead of actually staying within the bounds of evidence and reason." It's amusing that YOU typed that statement with a straight face. you desperately need to look up the meaning of "self awareness", partner... You have this funny habit of quoting specific stats and refusing to consider context, or ANY data that tends to unseat your position. (You also enjoy portraying yourself as somehow neutral and objective in your proclamations, although many seem to have a derisive quality about them.) It all goes with your "I am always right, just ask me and I'll confirm it" mantra. It would work so darn well if you were the czar but, alas... And yes, many of Pujols' Angels years were indeed below average for him- period. You worship stat lines, look it up. Doesn't mean he isn't a great player. It means he is human. Pretty sure your guy Babe Ruth "got a gift" of some pretty fair teammates to hit in, yes? (I know how you slob over the Babe, so I genuflected before I typed his name). So yes, Captain Obvious, players who accumulate lots of RBIs must have baserunners on in order to accomplish that task- glad you cleared that up for everyone. It's that pesky little task of actually doing it, that separates some players from others. Trent King By the way, it's completely unsurprising that you whiffed on the "Google machine" comment. You truly think that's what I believe it's called! Perfect. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Albert pujols - let's see them | gonefishin | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 88 | 10-05-2022 03:18 PM |
| Pujols 700! | campyfan39 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 09-25-2022 07:22 PM |
| Pujols | Touch'EmAll | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 41 | 08-01-2017 07:35 PM |
| Cards for sale in September. Cards added September 20. | Brian Van Horn | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 12-27-2015 10:28 AM |
| This a real Pujols | isaac2004 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 10 | 09-03-2012 08:47 AM |