SGC-Incredible Turnaround Time!!!

Snowman · #1 10-22-2022, 04:02 AM

I keep reading that PSA outsells SGC every time. Meanwhile, I keep crossing laughably undergraded PSA slabs into accurately graded SGC holders.

jimmer77 · #2 10-22-2022, 08:07 AM

I will continue to use both SGC and PSA, as I have subs at both companies right now, but have been leaning towards PSA for higher end cards and SGC for some niche cards that I like in their holders better than PS, but if SGC pricing came down and they had a registry then I may come back to SGC for all subs or if PSA came down in price and kept their current turn times then I don't know...my problem I don't have a loyalty and just sub to whoever I am in the mood for on the day I get my sub together...for example if I have something I want back fast then SGC if not then PSA...I guess just wishy washy alas Charlie Brown

Leon · #3 10-22-2022, 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman

I keep reading that PSA outsells SGC every time. Meanwhile, I keep crossing laughably undergraded PSA slabs into accurately graded SGC holders.

Or one is more lenient than the other.
.

cgjackson222 · #4 10-22-2022, 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon

Or one is more lenient than the other.
.

That's one way to look at it. But when you compare cards in old PSA holders to new ones, the difference is striking. Seems like PSA has become stricter by about 2 grades, some times even more.

When I look at SGC cards that were graded a decade ago, yes SGC has gotten slightly more strict, but overall seems a lot more consistent over time than PSA.

I think this relative consistency by SGC is a good thing.

Snowman · #5 10-22-2022, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cgjackson222

That's one way to look at it. But when you compare cards in old PSA holders to new ones, the difference is striking. Seems like PSA has become stricter by about 2 grades, some times even more.

When I look at SGC cards that were graded a decade ago, yes SGC has gotten slightly more strict, but overall seems a lot more consistent over time than PSA.

I think this relative consistency by SGC is a good thing.

Exactly this. It's not an issue of SGC being more lenient than PSA. It's an issue of competency at PSA with their 100+ newly hired inexperienced graders. These guys simply don't know how to grade vintage. PSA grades are wildly inconsistent. It's a HUGE problem. They truly are off by a full 2 grades these days on a ton of cards, and reliably off by at least one full grade. SGC has tightened up a little bit compared to prior industry standards, as you mentioned, but many of the grades coming out of PSA right now are facepalm worthy. I would argue that consistency is the single most important aspect of the grading industry behind the ability to spot a fake.

Peter_Spaeth · #6 10-22-2022, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman

Exactly this. It's not an issue of SGC being more lenient than PSA. It's an issue of competency at PSA with their 100+ newly hired inexperienced graders. These guys simply don't know how to grade vintage. PSA grades are wildly inconsistent. It's a HUGE problem. They truly are off by a full 2 grades these days on a ton of cards, and reliably off by at least one full grade. SGC has tightened up a little bit compared to prior industry standards, as you mentioned, but many of the grades coming out of PSA right now are facepalm worthy. I would argue that consistency is the single most important aspect of the grading industry behind the ability to spot a fake.

This one was a mystery to me but PSA just confirmed the grade.

Snowman · #7 10-23-2022, 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

This one was a mystery to me but PSA just confirmed the grade.

Sending a card in to PSA for review is generally not a good idea. They have a serious problem with hubris. Unless there's some significant surface flaw that we can't see from the scans, there's just no way that card is a 4. It should be a 6 at minumum today, and if graded 10+ years ago, the same card would be in an 8 or 9 holder. They're such a joke. It baffles my mind that the hobby awards them the level of respect that they have.

Lorewalker · #8 10-23-2022, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman

Sending a card in to PSA for review is generally not a good idea. They have a serious problem with hubris. Unless there's some significant surface flaw that we can't see from the scans, there's just no way that card is a 4. It should be a 6 at minumum today, and if graded 10+ years ago, the same card would be in an 8 or 9 holder. They're such a joke. It baffles my mind that the hobby awards them the level of respect that they have.

Agreed. Having PSA review something they have already graded expecting a change in the grade is dreaming.

The example above is not a good one to truly showcase the harsh grading. That issue is literally newsprint. Super thin and prone to small bends/crinkles/wrinkles. Most graded examples look like 9s or 10s and are in 4s and 5s due to those imperfections that do not even break the surfaces. The one posted above has to have several of those bends.

Peter_Spaeth · #9 10-23-2022, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman

Sending a card in to PSA for review is generally not a good idea. They have a serious problem with hubris. Unless there's some significant surface flaw that we can't see from the scans, there's just no way that card is a 4. It should be a 6 at minumum today, and if graded 10+ years ago, the same card would be in an 8 or 9 holder. They're such a joke. It baffles my mind that the hobby awards them the level of respect that they have.

Thanks. I looked at it closely and so did a friend who's been doing this for 30 years and neither of us saw anything.

Leon · #10 10-23-2022, 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

This one was a mystery to me but PSA just confirmed the grade.

Is there a surface wrinkle on the front, in the red border, below the name Santarosa'?

Peter_Spaeth · #11 10-23-2022, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon

Is there a surface wrinkle on the front, in the red border, below the name Santarosa'?

I don't think so?

Lorewalker · #12 10-22-2022, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman

Exactly this. It's not an issue of SGC being more lenient than PSA. It's an issue of competency at PSA with their 100+ newly hired inexperienced graders. These guys simply don't know how to grade vintage. PSA grades are wildly inconsistent. It's a HUGE problem. They truly are off by a full 2 grades these days on a ton of cards, and reliably off by at least one full grade. SGC has tightened up a little bit compared to prior industry standards, as you mentioned, but many of the grades coming out of PSA right now are facepalm worthy. I would argue that consistency is the single most important aspect of the grading industry behind the ability to spot a fake.

Absolutely agree that PSA is a wreck in the grading room. Too many graders. SGC on higher grade vintage is not doing much better from what I am seeing unless they are cards in submissions from the major auction houses.

I do not like what I am seeing coming from either of them on NM or better vintage. They both are failing miserably at their job. PSA might have more inexperienced graders but SGC is a very close second. Couple that with dudes seeing mostly modern stuff and you have a recipe for nice vintage getting crushed.

Snowman · #13 10-23-2022, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lorewalker

Absolutely agree that PSA is a wreck in the grading room. Too many graders. SGC on higher grade vintage is not doing much better from what I am seeing unless they are cards in submissions from the major auction houses.

I do not like what I am seeing coming from either of them on NM or better vintage. They both are failing miserably at their job. PSA might have more inexperienced graders but SGC is a very close second. Couple that with dudes seeing mostly modern stuff and you have a recipe for nice vintage getting crushed.

Ya, SGC is grading the NM+ stuff pretty harshly as well right now. But they're more fair with the mid grade stuff, which is what I mainly collect. I don't like VG cards, but I sure have been buying a lot of PSA 3 holders lately. I just crack them out the moment they arrive and laugh at the grade. Then SGC gives them 4s and 5s every time. It's pretty funny honestly.

cammb · #14 11-06-2022, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon

Or one is more lenient than the other.
.

That will be the day when I see an under graded PSA card!

Pat R · #15 11-06-2022, 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cammb

that will be the day when i see an under graded psa card!

img154.jpg
Black Background - Copy.jpg

img158.jpg
Black Background - Copy (2).jpg

bobbyw8469 · #16 01-18-2023, 09:21 AM

The turnaround time seems to have slowed.....

ClementeFanOh · #17 01-18-2023, 12:05 PM

I submitted 5 cards to SGC as part of a larger group on either Jan 2 or 3. Grades are online and cards due in hand later this week. If that is slower, I�ll gladly still take it

Trent King

bobbyw8469 · #18 01-19-2023, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClementeFanOh

I submitted 5 cards to SGC as part of a larger group on either Jan 2 or 3. Grades are online and cards due in hand later this week. If that is slower, I�ll gladly still take it

Trent King

THEY have slowed. But yes, they are still way faster than competitors.

gonefishin · #19 01-18-2023, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

The turnaround time seems to have slowed.....

Bob, must be dependent a little on the holidays and weather (transport mainly as they are in FL). I just received an order back that was processed amazingly fast.

Does anyone have experience in sending in vintage, autographed type 1 photos to PSA for classification and grading? If you want a nightmare experience, try that. I just received back the attached photo. I had reached the conclusion that it had been lost and was contemplating the next steps in filing a lost item claim. Of course, the photo came back with a crease through the middle that wasn't there when I sent it in - see the before and after photos - but I got it back. It was received by PSA NJ in early July 2022. This has turned into a "just glad to get back" situation.

Yoda · #20 01-18-2023, 02:54 PM

I think most who use them believe the quick turnaround times from SGC is a good thing, and, of course, it is. But my concern is whether my cards have spent enough time in the grading room being looked at by someone who knows what they are doing. I fear that the SGC business model might put more emphasis on quick returns than doing the card justice by the grader and they are harshly grading vintage to be on the safe side. Certainly, a T3 Matty deserves far more grading attention than a Mike Trout base RC.

Travis, your nice '54 Jackie was raped by PSA. How any grader could give that a 3 is beyond a travesty.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
CSG Turnaround Time	toledo_mudhen	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	5	06-08-2022 10:19 AM
SGC turnaround time	David W	Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)	7	06-19-2020 02:01 PM
PSA Turnaround Time.	NaplesGeezer	Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present)	2	03-24-2018 06:30 PM
PSA turnaround time faster than ever !	Mickey Mays	Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)	10	03-19-2017 03:37 PM
JSA turnaround time	mark evans	Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports	8	09-17-2012 04:40 PM