 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
11-03-2022, 04:55 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Good work as always, Darren. Your stuff here lays blatant just how random and inconsistent PSA is basically on any given day. Yet to no one's surprise, their lock on the market and collective imagination of many collectors remains unbroken. My hope with all of this is that at some point, inroads being made with consistency of quality from those such as SGC and CSG will break the spell. But I'm not betting on it happening anytime soon.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 11-03-2022 at 04:55 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How is this jackie certified by JSA | EYECOLLECTVINTAGE | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 7 | 03-06-2017 06:49 AM |
| I'm the least qualified to judge, but... LOL!! | ZenPop | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-13-2016 08:20 AM |
| PSA/DNA certified | footlong | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 3 | 08-06-2015 11:22 AM |
| A Qualified Peeve | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 12-18-2014 08:43 PM |
| PSA Question re: "MK" Qualified | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-24-2006 10:37 AM |
Threaded Mode