|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
There are SOOOO many terrible cut cards that have been made, but Signa Cuts is a leader in that game for sure. In some cases you have to take what you can get, I guess. I bashed a Pee Wee Reese once, on facebook I believe, and the response what not what I expected. Lots of people saying they'd give anything to own it and questioning why I thought it was so bad. It was ugly and terrible, especially considering Reese autographs weren't that tough to find at a very reasonable price and still aren't.
This isn't the one, but I came upon another recently and saved the image. I think it might have been from the same exact set, because I recall the other being 1 of 8 too. Partially clipped, tape over it and no image of Reese on the cards are 3 strikes for me. Low number and coming from a revered set are the only redeeming qualities in this case.
__________________
Looking for: Unique Steve Garvey items, select Dodgers Postcards & Team Issue photos |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yeah, they used to put tape over autographs to try to preserve the autograph which we now know is a terrible idea. The one I showed is especially bad considering the clashing colors of the sticker and the card above it, not to mention the unreadable autographs. SP Legendary Cuts usually does a better job than that though, it's especially egregious that the bottom of the autograph is cut off.
Last edited by etsmith; 01-15-2023 at 06:38 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
What's the point of this ugliness?
Isn't it infinitely better to leave the originally autographed card, cut, photo, album page or index card in tact? This is just nonsense. Last edited by perezfan; 01-15-2023 at 08:36 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I prefer the item intact and I rarely buy these kind of cards, but some of them do a much better job than others. I don't really mind cuts being put in the cards because it provides some protection to the cut autograph and often improves its appearance. But cutting certain things up to put them in cards is ridiculous, look at this one of Barack Obama.
B O.jpg |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't mind a cut autograph card, when It's cut from, lets say, a piece of paper or a scrap book. When they do it from a letter, or a photograph, I feel like it just ruins an historical item. Some of these cards above are abominations.
__________________
Successful Deals With: charlietheexterminator, todeen, tonyo, Santo10fan Bocabirdman (5x), 8thEastVB, JCMTiger, Rjackson44 Republicaninmass, 73toppsmann, quinnsryche (2x), Donscards. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree, letters and vintage photographs should never be cut up. There's a cut autograph card on eBay of Ernie Lombardi with two signatures above his still visible on the card, but it looks like somebody tried to erase them ruining both autographs. One of the ruined autographs is of Harlin Pool.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I've observed dozens of ugly cut autographs from Topps. This is a sin. RooseveltCut.jpg |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ugliest HOF Pre-War Card | LincolnVT | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 10-31-2020 05:14 PM |
| Let's see your ugliest autograph | gregr2 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 47 | 06-01-2014 11:00 AM |
| Ugliest. Card. Ever. | Bob Lemke | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 21 | 12-08-2013 05:30 PM |
| Maybe the Ugliest Joe D fake autograph ever | RichardSimon | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 9 | 06-11-2013 11:39 AM |
| What is the ugliest card you currently own? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 10-16-2008 08:43 PM |