SGC and Heritage ????

[Fred]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

Todd is exactly right—no screw up on SGC’s part. Deasley has 14 poses, all 1888 cards are with Washington. At the time we wrote the book we had not seen a Washington variation of this pose but since then another has been found and I have it listed in my personal updates. So, according to our book, which was all HA had to go by, it was unlisted. Therefore, neither SGC nor HA screwed up. I would suggest to Bobby that he consult the book before calling people out.

Jay - is there anyway to get a list of the updates for the book?

I started writing my previous post before you posted your last post. I got pulled away and finished it up and then saw you posted, which is awesome because I figured you'd have some great insight to this.

So, should we all be bidding on this newly found team variation? Just kidding.

[BobbyStrawberry]

Originally Posted by Fred

Jay - is there anyway to get a list of the updates for the book?

+1 - I'd love to see this also Jay if it's available to share.

[oldjudge]

Unfortunately, no. I’d suggest that people do what I do and write in additions to their book as they see them. The odds of there being a second edition are somewhere between slim and none, closer to the latter.

[BobbyVCP]

Apparently I am wrong in this case and sorry and apologize for calling out SGC and Heritage...

[Rhotchkiss]

Originally Posted by BobbyVCP

Apparently I am wrong in this case and sorry and apologize for calling out SGC and Heritage...

Bobby, just a suggestion, maybe revise the header and the content of your initial post. I have been wrong (many times) before, and I find that goes a long way. BTW- hope all is well

Ryan

[Fred]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

Unfortunately, no. I’d suggest that people do what I do and write in additions to their book as they see them. The odds of there being a second edition are somewhere between slim and none, closer to the latter.

Jay (Joe and Richard) - If you ever decide to go through your books and document all the "additions" you've each written down, feel free to email them to me. Either that or start an OJ Bible thread that covers these new findings.

The thread may not be like the "What's your monster number" thread, but at least it would be dedicated to OJs and become a living thread that would be brought to the main forum page when new information can be added. Call it the OJ Bible - addendum thread. Throw some of us dogs a bone.

Edited to add - if you guys send me your notes, I'd be happy to organize them and put them into a thread in the forum.