![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kevvy this has given us great info.The work you and Cliff have done is amazing. Others have chimed in with help,too. So many questions by solving the '66 7th series and now this tough hard- to- figure '67 6th series. Knowing the short prints and the location of cards on the slits is huge for both sets.
I know you have figured out other series layouts on '60's sets. I need to look back at past posts and see which series you and Cliff have determined to have short prints on other sets, too. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is what I show:
1960 - We haven't spent much time on the sheets for this year. There is a some uncut material (a slit from series 1, a panel with Maris etc.), but I don't have info on all of the series. 1961 - We know all ten rows in series 1, but not the pattern used. However, we believe we know the 3x vs 2x rows. Series 2 & 3- one slit is known, so the entire sheet is known. Series 4 - I only have a few miscuts, so I don't think the sheet is known. Series 5 - a lot of work has been done by others and I show that the entire sheet is known. Series 6 has 77 cards, but I do not show that the pattern is known. Finally, there is enough information to reconstruct the 66 card run for series 7, anmd so the entire sheet can be established. 1962 - I believe all sheets for this year have been determined. 1963 - I believe all sheets for this year have been determined. 1964 - Series 1 through 4 are known. Series 5 has one slit determined, but the 2nd slit hasn't been finalized yet. Very little is known about Series 6 while series 7 has three of the 7 rows established, but not the entire sheet. 1965 - All ten rows of series 1 are known, but the pattern for the sheet isn't known well enough to establish the sheet. Series 2, 3, 4, & 5 are known as is one slit (but not pattern) for series 7. Little is known about series 6. 1966 - The first three series are known, series 4 has been ony partially reconstructed (approx 40%), series 5 has been reconstructed with the exception of 3-4 cards, very little is known about series 6, and series 7 has been reconstructed (shown in this forum). 1967 - All ten rows are known for series 1 but the pattern for the 2nd slit is still speculative. Series 2, 3, 4, & 5 have enough information available to determine the sheet layouts. Series 6 has been reconstructed except for the placement of 2-3 cards, and although some question the validity of our proposed layout for series 7, I haven't seen anything to change my mind about the 1 by 5x, 1 by 4x, 5 by 3x pattern we proposed. 1968 - All ten rows are known for series 1 but the pattern for the 2nd slit is still speculative. Series 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, & 7 have enough information available to determine the sheet layouts. 1969 - All ten rows are known for series 1 but the pattern for the 2nd slit is still speculative. Series 2, 4, 5, & 6 have enough information available to determine the sheet layouts. Series 7 has been reconstructed except for 4-5 cards. Series 3, a 110 card series, is still in the formative stages of being reconstructed. We know most of the leading edge & trailing edge cards, and have a few miscuts, but most of the layout is still TBD. I hope this helps. If I have made any errors, please PM me. Kevin |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
f/s 1967 TOPPS #51 ASTROS ROOKIE STARS,1967 TOPPS #167 SENATORS ROOKIES | megalimey | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-29-2020 09:51 AM |
CLOSED: 1967 Topps 400+ Cards - Series 1-6: ENDS 2NITE Mon 6/12 | Paul S | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 7 | 06-12-2017 08:27 PM |
FS: 1967 Low Number Series Near Complete Set | ynnek4 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 17 | 09-25-2015 01:08 PM |
WTTF: 1967 Topps & 1972 Topps High Numbers - have 1967's and HOFers to trade | GehrigFan | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 06-14-2015 02:09 PM |
F/T: (3) 1967 stragglers (5th series) | SmokyBurgess | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-16-2011 07:46 AM |