![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would pick the CSG as the better looking card from the scans. The PSA is one of the red heavy tints that don’t look as good as the darker tints to my biased eyes.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would pick the CSG card as well out of these two. Top to bottom centering is much less annoying than left/right.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree. People will gravitate to the PSA card though.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1 on the SGC card being more pleasing to the eyes. The L-R centering, plus the tilt, on the PSA card really knocks it down for me.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-66) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agree with the others who have said the CSG card is nicer, though the top/bottom centering (on both) leaves a bit to be desired.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) Last edited by egri; 02-19-2023 at 10:16 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Agree. The issue with the bottom one for me is it’s off side to side also.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1962T Yaz -- Escher drawing? | Peter_Spaeth | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 06-28-2021 08:48 PM |
FS 1962T Jim Taylor PSA 7 | theuclakid | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 2 | 01-17-2021 02:20 PM |
1962T Green Tint | scottglevy | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 10-31-2019 07:00 PM |
WTB: 1962T Joe Torre RC | T206Collector | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-06-2014 08:10 AM |
1962t 10,18,53 sgc | jim | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-14-2014 05:27 PM |