|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
+1
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Centering never should have been a factor in grading to begin with.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lol. How many times can we have this exact discussion?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
300? It's a chat board. People chat.
To the original question, 2 grades is the perceived hickey. Some are more eyesores than others though. .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 02-23-2023 at 01:38 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree with the concept that 2 grades is an appropriate adjuster. In part it’s probably driven by PSA’s deduction of two grades when doing the set registry math, and the rest of us not having a more refined approach to take.
At the same time, a lot of collectors avoid qualifiers, so the adjustment in many cases might be even larger by the market. One further observation is that some items are so hard to find in any grade that a qualifier probably doesn’t make much of a difference at all. But for those cards, the same phenomenon holds true at the bottom of the grading scale as well, with or without qualifiers.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel Last edited by raulus; 02-23-2023 at 02:25 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
As one of a seemingly few on net54 who enjoys and seeks out the 'right' cards with qualifiers, let me offer a couple of quick examples as to why the the two-point drop in value doesn't often compute.
According to that theory, a PSA 8 OC and a PSA 6 should be the same price, so I did a quick search on PSA's 'Auction Prices Realized' site to find cards that had similar centering, and grabbed these four examples (not my cards)... This first pair was graded long ago, and although the centering is decently alike overall, the PSA 8 OC does have much better centering, and look how much sharper the corners are. For a moment, imagine the centering was (literally) exactly the same on both. The card with the qualifier is so much stronger in every other aspect, so it should never sell for the same price as the PSA 6. It is much more 'valuable.' 1969clementeOCcomp02.jpg In this example, the PSA 6 is a recent grade, so it must be better than the 6 in the previous example, but again, the card with the qualifier is much better in every aspect. The two cards should never command the same price. 1969clementeOCcomp01.jpg These are non-cherry-picked examples, so you can find a million other cards to either agree with or refute what I am saying, but the basic fact remains: “All OC cards are equal, but some OC cards are more equal than others.”
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I pretty much avoid them for the most part. There would have to be a huge discount for me to buy a PSA card with a qualifier.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA grading/pricing question | whiteymet | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-20-2022 01:45 PM |
| CGC Grading Pricing | Stampsfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-22-2020 07:41 PM |
| FYI: New Beckett Card Grading Pricing & Turnaround Times | ngnichols | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-12-2017 09:31 AM |
| A Qualified Peeve | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 12-18-2014 09:43 PM |
| Psa grading and pricing | Toneal13 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 28 | 11-29-2013 11:51 AM |