![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If we are talking about drafting a 9 man team, I am taking Honus Wagner. The gap from him to the #2 shortstop is bigger than from Ruth to the #2-8 corner outfielder. Bill James has Wagner as the #2 player of all time.
I would take Mays over Cobb, so I wouldn't pick him. Likewise, there is too much depth at pitcher to take Johnson (or Matty). |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Working on the following sets: 1916 and 1917 Zeenut, 1954B, 1955B, 1971T and 1972T |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ruth (greatest ever), then Wagner (best shortstop).
The fact that Cobb never won a championship may be partially due to the fact that his teammates never liked him and he was not great for team morale. And he didn't live up to expectations in postseason play. All of the other guys won at least one championship. Its a tossup between Johnson and Mathewson. As fast as Johnson pitched, I feel like players these days can hit the fastball. Not sure they could hit all of Mathewson's pitches. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
From an investment perspective, I'd take Ruth given he'd produce the absolute best ROI.
He transcended baseball and drew unprecedented crowds everywhere he went. He'd also draw other great players to my team, which would further strengthen my dynasty, produce post season play, and championships (all maximizing $). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ruth. You get two players for the price of one. If it weren’t for WWI, Ruth would have been a HOF pitcher. Tris Speaker said, “ Ruth made a grave mistake when he gave up pitching. Working once a week he might have lasted a long time and become a great star."
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Great question but I would go with Ruth first but the others are all 1A , B, C, and D Cannot go wrong with any
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1920s Advertising Card Babe Ruth/Carl Mays All Stars Throwing Pose 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Rare early Ruth Cards and Postcards Rare early Joe Jackson Cards and Postcards 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would have to pick Ruth. Curious what you mean when you say if it weren't for WWI, Ruth would have been a HoF pitcher. How did WWI cause him to move from pitcher to the outfield full time?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
During WWI Ballplayers were drafted in the Arm Services unless they were employed by an essential business for the War effort. Ruth was hired by a Steel Mill which was essential for the war and thus, he was exempted from the draft. However, that was not the case with many of the Red Sox’s other players and the 1918 Red Sox mainly fielded a Minor League Team. Ruth pestered the Front Office to let him play the field on days when he was not pitching. So partly as a way to invigorate the line-up and partly as a stunt to boost attendance, Ruth played first base when he was not pitching. The next year (1919), he was more of a regular player than a pitcher ( partly because of the larger attendance when he played) and in 1920 , he was traded to the Yanks.
Last edited by EddieP; 07-22-2023 at 02:40 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh, I'm sure the players of Johnson's time could hit the fastball, too, they just couldn't hit HIS. Big difference there.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. Ruth
2. Johnson 3. Wagner 4. Cobb 5. Mathewson |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ruth
It’s about championshipS .. Not 1 .. Not 2 .. Not 3 .. Not 4 .. Not 5 .. Not 6 .. 😊 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ty cobb
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm just recognizing that there aren't that many guys that can make a living off one pitch these days. Maybe Johnson could, maybe he couldn't.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Cobb all the way, never pick a pitcher.
__________________
![]() Collecting Detroit 19th Century N172, N173, N175. N172 Detroit. Getzein, McGlone, Rooks, Wheelock, Gillligan, Kid Baldwin Error, Lady Baldwin, Conway, Deacon White Positive transactions with Joe G, Jay Miller, CTANK80, BIGFISH, MGHPRO, k. DIXON, LEON, INSIDETHEWRAPPER, GOCUBSGO32, Steve Suckow, RAINIER2004, Ben Yourg, GNAZ01, yanksrnice09, cmiz5290, Kris Sweckard (Kris19),Angyal, Chuck Tapia,Belfast1933,bcbgcbrcb,fusorcruiser, tsp06, cobbcobb13 |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Definitely Ruth.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just have to take the guy who was undefeated in his World Series pitching record with an ERA of 0.87 and 29 2/3 consecutive scoreless innings. That would be Babe Ruth. I rest my case.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And I'm just recognizing that there was only one who could do it in the old days, or ever, for that matter.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is a timeless argument: who is more valuable, the great everyday player or the great pitcher who wins consistently every four or five games? I think Ruth's star power and drawing ability, along with his hitting, makes him the pick. But here's the case for Johnson: let's say you're the Washington manager while he's on your staff. He starts 666 games, finishes 532 of them, wins 417 of them, and shuts the other team out in 110. So when you send Walter out to the mound, you know he's going to finish 5 out of 6 games, win 2 out of 3 of them, and in 1 out of 6 the other team isn't even going to score a run! For 21 seasons he's going to do that for you. You'd have to give it some serious thought before letting THAT guy go to another team. Of course, having a shot at any of those players would be a franchise's dream come true.
Last edited by Hankphenom; 07-22-2023 at 12:58 PM. |
![]() |
|
|