Best card grades for the money - Net54baseball.com Forums
  NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-04-2023, 07:53 AM
Kutcher55 Kutcher55 is offline
J@son Per1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 901
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cgjackson222 View Post

For me, I am foremost looking for cards where the surface, color, and registration are excellent. I also look for cards that are centered from left to right, as top to bottom doesn't matter to me as much. Corners and the back are probably the least important thing to me. And if creasing isn't obvious, it usually doesn't bother me. .
Well said. I think a lot of collectors identify with the above, myself included. These sorts of cards go for a premium for the grade, but I'm willing to pay it, as I suspect you are too. Not everyone likes this profile -- I know some guys just want sharp and clean and are willing to accept off center -- but generally speaking, the cards that have even wear, nice color and registration, maybe some hidden wrinkles, good centering...they are sought after.

Here's an example. This Bronko sold for the same as a PSA 2.5. To me, it's a much better card, much nicer color and balance. These features are priced in, but I'd still rather have this 1.5 than the higher grade card.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-04-2023, 08:02 AM
Kutcher55 Kutcher55 is offline
J@son Per1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 901
Default

Here's the aforementioned 2.5. Totally inferior card for the same $.



And here's a 6.5. Is it really worth 6x the price?



6.5 is such a tease. I'll never buy one.

1.5 baby!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-04-2023, 08:05 AM
cgjackson222's Avatar
cgjackson222 cgjackson222 is offline
Charles Jackson
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,959
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kutcher55 View Post
Well said. I think a lot of collectors identify with the above, myself included. These sorts of cards go for a premium for the grade, but I'm willing to pay it, as I suspect you are too. Not everyone likes this profile -- I know some guys just want sharp and clean and are willing to accept off center -- but generally speaking, the cards that have even wear, nice color and registration, maybe some hidden wrinkles, good centering...they are sought after.

Here's an example. This Bronko sold for the same as a PSA 2.5. To me, it's a much better card, much nicer color and balance. These features are priced in, but I'd still rather have this 1.5 than the higher grade card.

That is a fantastic 1.5

What am I missing? Some creases the scan didn't pick up? Something wrong with the back?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-04-2023, 12:30 PM
Kutcher55 Kutcher55 is offline
J@son Per1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 901
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cgjackson222 View Post
That is a fantastic 1.5

What am I missing? Some creases the scan didn't pick up? Something wrong with the back?
Not sure, not my card, but it is nice!

That Evers is absurd! What a beauty.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-04-2023, 02:22 PM
vintagebaseballcardguy's Avatar
vintagebaseballcardguy vintagebaseballcardguy is offline
R0b3rt Ch!ld3rs
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,572
Default

This is a fun topic, and I was actually thinking about it yesterday and found this video. Maybe some of you will like it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mt4h7DETVTQ
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-04-2023, 09:46 PM
bk400 bk400 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagebaseballcardguy View Post
This is a fun topic, and I was actually thinking about it yesterday and found this video. Maybe some of you will like it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mt4h7DETVTQ
Very informative video -- thanks for sharing. Sounds like there's a lot of value to be found in the lower grades with vintage cards. Makes the hunt more fun than for the modern cards.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-05-2023, 11:36 AM
UKCardGuy's Avatar
UKCardGuy UKCardGuy is offline
Gary G01db3rg
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,531
Default

Personally VGEX 4 and EXMT 6 are where I find the sweet spot for quality vs price for post-war vintage.

I don't mind a card that's a little bit OC but I want sharp corners and no creases. I don't tend to get that with VG 3
Attached Images
File Type: jpg s-l1600.jpg (78.2 KB, 398 views)
File Type: jpg s-l1600 (2).jpg (200.4 KB, 395 views)
__________________
Working on the following sets: 1952 Star-Cal, 1954B, 1955B, 1969T Super, 1971T and 1972T
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-05-2023, 07:16 PM
jethrod3 jethrod3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Posts: 346
Default

I bought a 1955 Topps Jackie Robinson at the National in a PSA 3.5 holder. It had a couple of corners with a little wear, but was probably docked the most for a corner front surface crease visible only under high intensity light. So it presents fabulously. I'll take those kinds of surface creases all day as 3.5's.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-07-2023, 08:04 AM
jchcollins's Avatar
jchcollins jchcollins is offline
John Collins
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NC
Posts: 3,712
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UKCardGuy View Post
Personally VGEX 4 and EXMT 6 are where I find the sweet spot for quality vs price for post-war vintage.

I don't mind a card that's a little bit OC but I want sharp corners and no creases. I don't tend to get that with VG 3
Makes sense. 4 is the old "tweener" grade between VG and EX, and 6 is the same for what used to be EX and NM. Lots of really nice looking cards can be found in those slabs.

Part of the problem with TPG's is pegging tweener grades like that to a number. That doesn't make a lot of sense if you look at how grading worked in say, 1985. Now we have broken the numbers down into half grades as well. 4.5, VG-EX+. Wouldn't VG to Excellent (plus) just be Excellent? Don't get me wrong, I get it - it's how things have evolved.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets.

Last edited by jchcollins; 08-07-2023 at 08:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-04-2023, 07:24 PM
jb67 jb67 is offline
D@v!d W@tk!n$
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,020
Default

That Nagurski is off the charts for a 1.5. Well worth the 2.5 price tag if you ask me. Here is my favorite 1.5.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Kutcher55 View Post
Well said. I think a lot of collectors identify with the above, myself included. These sorts of cards go for a premium for the grade, but I'm willing to pay it, as I suspect you are too. Not everyone likes this profile -- I know some guys just want sharp and clean and are willing to accept off center -- but generally speaking, the cards that have even wear, nice color and registration, maybe some hidden wrinkles, good centering...they are sought after.

Here's an example. This Bronko sold for the same as a PSA 2.5. To me, it's a much better card, much nicer color and balance. These features are priced in, but I'd still rather have this 1.5 than the higher grade card.

Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Printing More Money vs. High Card Prices Leon Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 73 02-24-2021 02:13 PM
Best Ruth card for the money baez578 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 22 06-17-2013 06:18 PM
O/T:For all of you who doubt me paying the card dealers I owe money to!!! Zone91 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 93 05-09-2013 08:52 PM
Pretty good money for a trimmed card Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 18 07-10-2007 10:34 PM
Buy It Now (I Would If I Had The Money Or Needed The Card) Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 11 11-16-2005 03:53 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:40 PM.


ebay GSB