|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Here's an example. This Bronko sold for the same as a PSA 2.5. To me, it's a much better card, much nicer color and balance. These features are priced in, but I'd still rather have this 1.5 than the higher grade card.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's the aforementioned 2.5. Totally inferior card for the same $.
![]() And here's a 6.5. Is it really worth 6x the price? ![]() 6.5 is such a tease. I'll never buy one. 1.5 baby! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What am I missing? Some creases the scan didn't pick up? Something wrong with the back? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That Evers is absurd! What a beauty. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is a fun topic, and I was actually thinking about it yesterday and found this video. Maybe some of you will like it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mt4h7DETVTQ
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Personally VGEX 4 and EXMT 6 are where I find the sweet spot for quality vs price for post-war vintage.
I don't mind a card that's a little bit OC but I want sharp corners and no creases. I don't tend to get that with VG 3
__________________
Working on the following sets: 1952 Star-Cal, 1954B, 1955B, 1969T Super, 1971T and 1972T |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I bought a 1955 Topps Jackie Robinson at the National in a PSA 3.5 holder. It had a couple of corners with a little wear, but was probably docked the most for a corner front surface crease visible only under high intensity light. So it presents fabulously. I'll take those kinds of surface creases all day as 3.5's.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Part of the problem with TPG's is pegging tweener grades like that to a number. That doesn't make a lot of sense if you look at how grading worked in say, 1985. Now we have broken the numbers down into half grades as well. 4.5, VG-EX+. Wouldn't VG to Excellent (plus) just be Excellent? Don't get me wrong, I get it - it's how things have evolved.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 08-07-2023 at 08:08 AM. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
That Nagurski is off the charts for a 1.5. Well worth the 2.5 price tag if you ask me. Here is my favorite 1.5.
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Printing More Money vs. High Card Prices | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 02-24-2021 02:13 PM |
| Best Ruth card for the money | baez578 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 06-17-2013 06:18 PM |
| O/T:For all of you who doubt me paying the card dealers I owe money to!!! | Zone91 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 93 | 05-09-2013 08:52 PM |
| Pretty good money for a trimmed card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-10-2007 10:34 PM |
| Buy It Now (I Would If I Had The Money Or Needed The Card) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-16-2005 03:53 PM |