 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-12-2023, 08:54 AM
|
||||
|
||||
The biggest reason for the price differential, IMO, is that the T205 is a "standard-sized" card that can go in the standard PSA slab. The 202 has to go in a tallboy holder, and the mainstream collectors don't want to store them.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
|
#2
08-14-2023, 04:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Winning Streak Comparisons: | clydepepper | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 10 | 04-16-2023 12:17 PM |
| Suprising Player Comparisons | jasonc | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 3 | 08-11-2017 03:22 PM |
| D381 card comparisons with pictures | bcornell | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-13-2015 05:05 PM |
| SGC and PSA T206 pop report comparisons 2006 and 2008 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-03-2008 06:06 PM |
| Misc quality vintage tobacco stuff for sale | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-17-2007 09:33 AM |
Hybrid Mode
