Another successful Net54 connection - thx Derek G!

[t206fanatic]

Originally Posted by BillyCoxDodgers3B

This uber-strict grading of the last couple of years really leaves me scratching my head. The absolutely beautiful work of art you have presented above is apparently a "3". So, someone is trying to tell us that this piece is only 30% towards being perfect? Unless the back is truly hideous, that's ridiculous. What would this have been before the TPG standards were reinvented? A 5?

I haven't collected unsigned cards in over 30 years, but if I did, they would all be raw.

Either way, you can be proud to own that one. For my needs, I'd never want an upgrade on that beauty.

it is a beautiful card!

there appears to be a wrinkle / crease on Sandy's ear, I know the TPG's are very harsh on any bends.

[BillyCoxDodgers3B]

Originally Posted by t206fanatic

it is a beautiful card!

there appears to be a wrinkle / crease on Sandy's ear, I know the TPG's are very harsh on any bends.

Aah, that would do it. Truthfully, I thought that looked like a scuff on the holder. If not, there's the easy explanation.

But, if you're looking at a card and are more focused on all of its attributes than the things going against it, that's the best sign of a great card, no matter what the grade. This one is just beautiful, and like all of us, I've certainly seen lots of the Sandy RC. The colors are so crisp, everything is crystal clear, and I just love the centering. Some centering purists may tell me I'm off, who knows? The only detrimental aspect may be that staining along the top. If it is indeed a crease or wrinkle as you say, that wouldn't attract my eye as much as the stain. Again, just a stellar card for the grade IMHO.

[Jewish-collector]

Mazel Tov Jeff beer chug.gifbeer chug.gifbeer chug.gif

[h2oya311]

Thanks for the shout-out, Jeff! I always appreciate working with other collectors who understand that this isn’t your typical “3”. This card is the definition of “collector grade”.

Hope to work with you again in the future!