 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-28-2023, 03:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
It's good
Everything about this is Jackie, looking or overthinking one letter or a couple of atypical elements shouldn't detract from the autograph as a whole. Sign your name 1,000 times and there are going to be some versions that have weird letter formations here and there. Overall speed, size, shape and best wishes are all spot on to Jackie, the angle of the auto and letter spacing is also where it should be. My honest guess is either the paper/card stock isn't completely smooth or the pen had an issue.
I'd have no issue owning this auto, and I've been collecting Jackie for nearly 20 years now. Last edited by Kco; 08-28-2023 at 03:25 PM. 
|
|
#3
08-28-2023, 06:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I wouldn't touch it with a 10.ft.pole. nothing unique or interesting, only thing...probably cheap...for good reason. Save the funds amd buy something more presentable, or graded
Just my opinion
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors
|
|
#4
08-29-2023, 07:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jackie
I too think it's good. Atypical, but good. Just because Beckett doesn't give it their stamp of approval means nothing unless you plan to resell it. The reason I live it is because of the spacing of the "ie" after the "k" in "Jackie" It's tight and close. Just my 2 cents.
|
|
#5
08-30-2023, 01:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
08-31-2023, 06:51 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
No good
|
|
#7
08-31-2023, 06:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The "b-i" is slowly drawn, not signed IMO
"Jackie "Atypical slant The list goes on and on
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors Last edited by Republicaninmass; 08-31-2023 at 06:54 AM.
|
|
#8
08-31-2023, 06:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Ever hear the one about my signed 52 jackie? Psa quick opinion declined it, seller sold it to me on tilt, it passed in PSAs hands.
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors
|
|
#11
09-02-2023, 06:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
With the bigger names, and Jackie seems to be rapidly entering that upper echelon, there is no need to pounce on the first thing that comes along when there is so much out there. Jackie signed a LOT, with 3X5s being among the most commonly encountered items. Even if you feel something is real but you're stuck looking at an atypically-signed area of the autograph, just wait for something more in line with the standard. Remember, if you're staring at the piece and saying, "Well, this part is out of character, but the rest looks fine...", so will everyone else when it comes time to sell.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jackie Robinson Opinion | AnkurJ | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 10 | 11-30-2022 08:13 PM |
| Jackie Robinson Opinion | Kathy062495 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 12-16-2018 10:45 AM |
| Jackie Robinson opinion | toyman55 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 02-20-2015 09:24 PM |
| Jackie Robinson opinion | toyman55 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 11 | 08-01-2014 07:14 PM |
| Jackie Robinson opinion | theshleps | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 3 | 11-16-2013 10:23 AM |
Hybrid Mode
