 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-01-2023, 05:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
-(No-Period-or-Streak-visible-ifor-170-Dick-McAuliffe).jpg?id=9056803e-5767-4563-b3f5-7667ef225933&size=zoom&side=back) Card 103 in the 1967 set, the Mickey Mantle checklist has two standard variations. 170 is D. McAuliffe or D| McAuliffe (where the period is a streak), which PSA lists as the "D McAuliffe" variant. Here's one PSA graded as an 8 (so should not have any surface damage) that has neither the period or the streak. Is this a valid third recurring print variation, or just a one-off? If so, I guess PSA would label it "No period or streak" if they were to verify it again. I think the grader didn't even realize the period was supposed to be a streak on this card, because the variation type is inaccurate/vague in PSA's database.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 07:05 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 12:52 PM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 05:32 PM |
| Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 08:58 PM |
| Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 08:23 PM |
Hybrid Mode
