|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think guys with compact swings would fare better than guys with the big swings. So, I'd say Cobb and Williams would be fine, while Ruth and DiMaggio (and Musial) might have a tougher time with the fast, late-breaking stuff.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ruth in todays game - Daniel Vogelbach ? NO !
but the body shapes would be very similar |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ruth, time traveled in his prime directly today couldn't make a AA roster
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
and the modern AA player would have a batting average of 612 and hit 97 home runs off the same pitching Ruth faced.
Last edited by bnorth; 10-15-2023 at 11:08 AM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ruth was the best hitter back then. Of course he could hit today’s pitching. Assuming otherwise seems ridiculous. Many of today’s pitchers are fast but stink. Mets staff has been full of those guys.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Pitchers throw much harder today and are aided by aided by advances in science that pitchers 100 years ago didn't have.
But, imagine how much better past great hitters would be if they were transported to the present and had access to everything that hitters today have, like strength and conditioning coaching, dieticians and improved health/lifestyle information, data on swing mechanics and other hitting analytics, opposition research, and of course, the new shift limitations.
__________________
_ Successful transactions with: Natswin2019, ParachromBleu, Cmount76, theuclakid, tiger8mush, shammus, jcmtiger, oldjudge, coolshemp, joejo20, Blunder19, ibechillin33, t206kid, helfrich91, Dashcol, philliesfan, alaskapaul3, Natedog, Kris19, frankbmd, tonyo, Baseball Rarities, Thromdog, T2069bk, t206fix, jakebeckleyoldeagleeye, Casey2296, rdeversole, brianp-beme, seablaster, twalk, qed2190, Gorditadogg, LuckyLarry, tlhss, Cory, zizek |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In sports you have essentially three components that make a player good: talent, skill and intelligence (in all its forms). When you play sports as a kid it's easy to identify guys who have an abundance of talent. Hand eye coordination, balance, speed, strength. Later you see which of them hone their skills (and intelligence) with practice, observation, coaching, facing top competition, etc. And of course some guys with less natural talent succeed by becoming so skillful and savvy that they can outplay guys who are more naturally gifted.
I suspect most of the truly gifted athletes of the past would, over the course of their playing lives, adjust to their competition and improve their skills much the same way today's young players do. No one is born hitting 105 mph sliders or Zach Wheeler slurves. I bet a young Ty Cobb or Oscar Charleston would look at those pitches in awe - - for about three minutes. Then they would say "give me a week to figure this out." |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You guys honestly think just nobody alive in the 1920-30’s were in any way athletic? WTF? There are young players today with some very minor training as youths that can compete at the highest levels of today’s game yet nobody from the past would have been able to compete. Clown stuff!
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Have news for you Lou Gehrig or Ted Kluszewski were naturally strong and would destroy these pretty boys that lift the weights and use the special wheaties. A cock strong guy as we used to call them always destroyed the pretty boy weight trainers.
I've spent 40 plus years working out and I've seen it time and time again. Debate it all you want but it's a fact. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I honestly don’t know who would struggle more…
1. The best from the past being transported today with all the modern advances and salary and computer/video help to adjust their game. -or- 2. The best from today transported to 1920 and having to play in those conditions with only the technology available at the time with no IR and pitchers having to pitch complete games and little to no use of relief pitching.
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Good call RY.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The AVERAGE player of the past could only do better today. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Purely Hypothetical Question | frankbmd | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 12 | 10-09-2022 11:06 AM |
| Hypothetical question | SMPEP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 06-29-2017 04:33 PM |
| Hypothetical T206 Question | rp12367 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-12-2012 08:30 PM |
| Hypothetical Question regarding Rare Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-13-2007 09:29 AM |
| B/S/T Hypothetical Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 01-10-2007 07:12 PM |