|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter- You're correct in that this isn't hard to grasp, you are just getting the
"hard to grasp" item wrong (deliberately, in all likelihood)... The original post was a self-described "vent" by someone who expressed astonishment/contempt/bemusement about the continuous self-involved exploits of ARod, who apparently had to start a campaign to get his number retired by the Yankees (yes, he's burrowing ever lower into the desperate former athlete category). This is very, very easy to follow UNTIL people derail. You and the omniscient baseball guru 1911 fall into this category. You and 1911 are essentially the "ARods" of this thread, actually- blissfully unaware that you are in the wrong and dug in. Feel free to stay there, but it won't make either of you right. Bottom line: the Yankees organization clearly feels that they have no need, and certainly no obligation, to honor a fecal stain who caused them headache after headache. It's their call, everything else is smoke. Capisce? Trent King |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh, if only omniscience was as easy to achieve as recognize the indisputable fact that PED scandal is not the barrier to Yankee number retirement we would all be omniscient.
I am always amused when you and I are throw in together, Peter, considering that we do nothing but argue with each other and agree on almost nothing under the sun beyond some elementary underling facts of whatever the issue is. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
1911- And I'm always amused when you anoint yourself the undisputed
arbiter of fact. Got anything pertaining to the initial point of the post? King Trent King |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I know it's been a month since my favorite stalker has carried on his personal vendetta, but try harder. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter- nope, not gonna work. There's no ranting or raving, all breakable
objects in my home are quite safe. Blood pressure checks ok, good to go. Try to stay on point next time- wait. Don't try, actually do it. Anything related to the scope of the original thread post, or is it more diversion? Trent King PS- I already know the answer to that question. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 10-23-2023 at 01:32 PM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
But evaluated for what? The article and thread title is about whether the Yankees should retire a player's number. There are no statistical parameters for that.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
It has been explained at length that the only thing that factors into a number being retired is how the franchise and fans feel about the player.
But you choose to discuss stats and PEDs, which can impact how fans feel about a player, but do not actually represent credentials for retiring your number. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
3 All Star appearances in 18 years, basically a 4.00 lifetime ERA. Eh. Last edited by Shoeless Moe; 10-23-2023 at 06:25 PM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah but 250 wins and all those postseasons, I hear you, but is there a better example of the "Packs rule"?
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Unless you count they were an average player, but then became a very good coach/manager, but just true average players no matter how beloved do not get their #'s retired. If so the Cubs would have retired Buckner, DeJesus, Mark Grace, among others. Gotta put up numbers. But Pettite, maybe Michael Young (Texas), Jimmy Wynn (Houston), Strawberry & Gooden (Mets) are among the weakest out there compared to the Greats of the game that have their #'s retired. Last edited by Shoeless Moe; 10-23-2023 at 06:49 PM. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
1911- you and the facts have again parted company, you aren’t as level headed and unbiased as you claim. PEDs are one of a laundry list of reasons this tool isn’t getting what he craves. You’re wrong, it’s a cited reason but not the only reason. That’s the beauty of Arod- you can’t swing a stick without hitting a reason to dislike him. You 2 are alike in that regard. Try harder. Trent King
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Post 20 raised the PED question as to whether he was overrated as a player. I responded to that by questioning how anyone in the steroid era could be fairly evaluated, and Greg pointed out that PEDs could not be the reason for devaluing ARod by the Yankees given how they treated Petitte. This is all clearly within the subject, easy to understand, and I don't know what your issue is at this point, though I won't take it personally if you want to rant and rave some more.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 10-23-2023 at 01:14 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1994 SP Alex Rodriguez PSA 9 | Peter_Spaeth | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 05-15-2022 09:06 AM |
| Alex Rodriguez Questionable? | SyrNy1960 | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 20 | 05-10-2022 01:11 PM |
| wtb 1994 SP Die-Cut Alex Rodriguez | Peter_Spaeth | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 06-07-2020 08:12 PM |
| 1999 Alex Rodriguez | Shoeless joe | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 04-27-2016 07:16 AM |
| Alex Rodriguez - nice gig if you can get it | doug.goodman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 02-08-2014 01:50 PM |