This is Vent Thread - Lets define "Pumper" relating to this section of this website

[Rhotchkiss]

I have said it before G1911 -- I do not like you and I think you are a dipshit. That is no secret and I am happy to, again, state that publicly.

That said, I am genuinely interested to see if the rest of this community agrees with your definition of what a pumper is.

Almost anytime someone asks an investment-financial related question, you quip in with your "pumper" BS. For example, 16 posts into the very recent thread called "How did this all Start", a thread that asks a genuine question and contains legitimate discussion, you state:

"A whole lot of collectibles and hobbies saw spikes with many people hiding inside, not working much, and getting paid still. The only surprise is that some people are surprised the pumpers weren't right and the market is falling instead of continuing to just go up forever. None of the pumpers were willing to share the screenshots of them cashing out their 401K's to buy cards like they were advising others to do for some reason. Wonder why."

Nobody on this site ever said this. You try to make every investment/money-based thread about pumpers, draining 401ks, and a market that only goes up. I believe you are wrong and I believe most of this community believes you are wrong.

Later in that same thread, in response to the question of whether people are rooting for prices to fall, you state: "Rooting for it? I'd root for a full collapse. Cards are for fun and a hobby, not a profit center in my portfolio. The cheaper they are the more cards I can have fun collecting. It's not in my interest for prices to go up as a collector. Rising prices = good for investor or collector/investor, falling prices = good for collector." If anything, it seems to me your posts are intended to pump negativity into the asset class so that prices come down, in your interest as a collector. You may be the biggest (anti) pumper here!

If we can get a consensus on the definition of a pumper, we can determine whether we have any on this site, and thus, determine the veracity or inaccuracy of your constant statements and we can call a real pumper a pumper.

Ryan Hotchkiss

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss

I have said it before G1911 -- I do not like you and I think you are a dipshit. That is no secret and I am happy to, again, state that publicly.

That said, I am genuinely interested to see if the rest of this community agrees with your definition of what a pumper is.

Almost anytime someone asks an investment-financial related question, you quip in with your "pumper" BS. For example, 16 posts into the very recent thread called "How did this all Start", a thread that asks a genuine question and contains legitimate discussion, you state:

"A whole lot of collectibles and hobbies saw spikes with many people hiding inside, not working much, and getting paid still. The only surprise is that some people are surprised the pumpers weren't right and the market is falling instead of continuing to just go up forever. None of the pumpers were willing to share the screenshots of them cashing out their 401K's to buy cards like they were advising others to do for some reason. Wonder why."

Nobody on this site ever said this. You try to make every investment/money-based thread about pumpers, draining 401ks, and a market that only goes up. I believe you are wrong and I believe most of this community believes you are wrong.

If we can get a consensus on the definition of a pumper, we can determine whether we have any on this site, and thus, determine the veracity or inaccuracy of your constant statements

Ryan Hotchkiss

Took you three tries to summon the courage to say what you are "happy" to state, after first insisting this isn't about what it's obviously about .

Actually, you are the only one of us to have made a thread about pumpers. I have posted occasionally in threads already about them. You can easily see the threads I've made, almost all research type.

The only time I remember us getting into it is when I criticized you sharing your wish of a politician you don't like to be murdered so you could collect the lynch knot in a thread that had been very interesting before your bizarrely violent hijack. You are welcome to think I am a dipshit and try to stir up a community against me. Go ahead.

If you want to actually debate something said, then you quote that post and reply to it in that thread with your argument. If you want to throw childish tantrums, lie about the purpose and keep making new threads to bitch at your enemies, then do that.

[BobbyStrawberry]

Speaking of things that happen occasionally in "this section of the website" I know of no other member than OP that throws around ad hominem attacks on other members in this section for simply disagreeing with them.

[theshowandme]

The actual pumpers you see on YouTube with their investment channels and clips of them spending five/six figures at card shows probably do not even know what Net54 is.

[anchorednw]

if anything, it seems to me your posts are intended to pump negativity into the asset class so that prices come down, in your interest as a collector. You may be the biggest (anti) pumper here!

No dog in the fight, but this was a fun rebuttal. +1 Ryan