|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree with the grading of late, past 3 years on vintage.
PSA in my opinion has two things SGC will never have and that is Pop and Registry to me that means total control of the Value of the Investors Premium Vintage Grail Slabbed Collections already graded thus keeping their value high and pops low. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Great examples! Thanks for sharing.
Pretty crazy how harsh PSA has gotten on vintage. The one thing I would say is that SGC can sometimes be harsh re: centering. So if you have a centered vintage card, your best would be to go with SGC. But if your card is not centered, it is more of a crapshoot between PSA and SGC. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
It works both ways. I recently had an entire sub severely undergraded by SGC. I regraded the three cards I cared most about with PSA. +2, +2, and +.5.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 12-08-2023 at 08:24 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Great examples snowman. Using the same card is WAY more realistic that 2 completely different cards of the same grade. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is an extremely rare circumstance in my experience. Unless your cards were heavily OC.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
They were not, not at all. I guess I got unlucky with the grader. Two grades low, consistently. Worse in some cases.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 12-08-2023 at 09:53 AM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Outstanding post and pics. Really drives the point home.
I have used SGC exclusively since their days in Parsippany. I have always been satisfied by the grade received and cannot understand why people keep giving their money to PSA, only to be disappointed on some level. Last edited by Vintagedeputy; 12-08-2023 at 09:28 AM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Its a fool's folly to think that two subjective, arbitrary, constantly-evolving grading scales developed by independent, competing companies would line up when grading cards. There should be no expectation that a PSA 6 should line up with an SGC 6, condition wise and/or price wise.
Add to that, the subjectivity of the individual graders and even the non-repeatability of a given grader over time, it's no wonder that the data is all over the place. It does seem like SGC gives a bit more weight to 'eye appeal' than does PSA, sometimes giving a bump for better centered cards. To me, that is preferable.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-54) 1954 Bowman (-2) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This is also happening on vintage auto grading and has been for a few years. What was once a 10 is now an 8, etc. PSA 9 is about as good as you'll ever get on a grade now. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WIFE SAYS SELL OFF EXTRAS..PRICES REDUCED.80+ SLABS! Cross posted | insrman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 11-15-2022 09:55 AM |
| WIFE SAYS SELL OFF EXTRAS..PRICES REDUCED.80+ SLABS! Cross posted | insrman | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-15-2022 09:55 AM |
| Massive sell-off of acquired PSA SLABS ['61-'78]!!! | insrman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 1 | 05-19-2021 08:29 AM |
| Mouse over image to zoom Have one to sell? Sell it yourself 1895 N300 Mayo Cut Plug | mcap100176 | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 02-09-2013 05:02 AM |
| Updated with BL & Pied 42 list.......Sell sell sell sell some more | Pup6913 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 7 | 05-01-2012 07:42 AM |