 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-08-2023, 06:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
#2
12-08-2023, 07:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Want to buy or trade for T213-1 (Bob Rhoades) Other Louisiana issues T216 T215 T214 T213 Etc
|
|
#3
12-08-2023, 07:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Their database is trash and horrible. Good luck even finding the sets half the time.
Example of the user experience: I search "T220" and do the stupid captcha. It says I need to use 8 or more characters. I search "T220 Silver" and do the stupid captcha. It says 0 results. I search "T220 boxing" and fill out the stupid captcha. It says 0 results. I search "T220 Mecca" and fill out the stupid captcha. I finally get the set. It doesn't split the silver set and the white set so I have to account pops by hand to filter. Then it becomes apparent that this dataset is wildly incomplete and inaccurate with tons of SGC graded cards obviously not included. The Donovan silver, which they have graded, is not even listed as a valid card. Nor is the Corbett, which they have not graded before. I realize this is not only a pain to use but garbage and incomplete data, and then go to PSA's site and get their data within 60 seconds in a usable format.
|
|
#4
12-08-2023, 08:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
SGC is okay for T206's but they don't break them down by factory and PSA has been doing that for years so you can get a pretty good idea on the numbers for the ones that were graded prior to the factory designation.
For example there are 76 Sweet Caporal 350 Steve Evans in their pop report with this breakdown Sweet Caporal 350 = 76 Sweet Caporal 350/25 = 6 Sweet Caporal 350/30 = 38 There are 32 Sweet Caporal 350's in the pop report that don't have the factory designation but using the 13.63% that the factory 25's represent in the ones that have the factory numbers would put the total around 65-66 factory 30 and 10-11 factory 25's. Evans.jpg
|
|
#5
12-08-2023, 09:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ALWAYS check the SGC pop report
|
|
#6
12-08-2023, 10:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was checking both the PSA and the SGC pop report over a few days for the recent thread I started on the Sports Co. of America/Spalding set (PSA lists as Spalding, SGC as Sports Co. of America, the latter being how this set is most commonly referred to currently). Definitely the PSA site is much easier to access, whereas the SGC has 5 separate listings to 'captcha'. In addition I had to remember to click on the 'Show Old Grading' to make sure that I was getting a more complete record of what has 'supposedly' been graded when it came to the 4 different possible backs (this 'supposed' nugget also applies to PSA).
So not as nice, but still potentially useful. YMMV (Your Misanthropy May Vary). Brian
|
|
#7
12-08-2023, 11:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm still trying to figure out why some years have multiple designations for their pop reports.
1887 Gold Coin (Buchner) (N284) - Baseball 1887 Gold Coin (Buchner) (N284) (N284) - Baseball They are both well populated and it's not broken up by old-label-flip year designations like 1886-1890 Old Judge cards.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CSG pop report | Frank A | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-10-2022 08:55 AM |
| PSA Pop Report | Yoda | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-16-2021 08:50 PM |
| PSA Pop Report | Lgarza99 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-13-2014 06:18 AM |
| Please report | Bestdj777 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 08-06-2013 03:55 PM |
| need a pop report in psa | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-05-2007 08:35 AM |
Hybrid Mode
