Childhood Reckoning? (real/fake)

[Southpaw85]

Thanks for feedback - I will delete and better report later. Sorry for inconveniences all around...

[WhatsNext]

Aaron and Sosa look bad, no idea about Bonds. All others are 100% authentic.

[Kaneen]

First off, now that you have the pics oriented properly, I see absolutely nothing wrong with your post.

As for the autographs, Aaron and Sosa were the 2 that gave me pause also, but the majority of what I see look fine. I think you navigated your childhood collecting years better than most...except for the unfortunate ones that were signed on cheap balls and have bled/faded badly as a result.

Good luck with your collection!

[Kco]

All the balls except for Aaron and Sosa Balls are fine.

All flats appear good as well, so you did pretty well!

[Rob L]

Aaron and Sosa were the ones I noticed. All others seem fine!

[swarmee]

Same; you have a lot of items/players that are unlikely to be faked. So many of those guys were on the card show circuit for decades, and their autographs are consistent, that nearly all of them are good.
As for which you should get authenticated, I would say the convention page with Mays on it. Then the Bonds, Griffey Jr, and maybe the Gwynn ball.

On the others, you'd pay more than half what the items are worth for the authentication, IMO. That's where it's a waste of money to me.

[mcgwirecom]

Aaron and Sosa jumped out as no good.