|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did the original seller of this card ask for a lot of $? If so, I think that's a clear indicator they knew of the significance of this SL with Piedmont 350 back, hence why they may have rebacked it.
But if it sold for cheap, then it just seems strange to me why they would go through all the trouble to reback it.
__________________
http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/schneids |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Maybe the rebacker did this odd combination just to see if it was detected - with a 350 back I wouldn't have given it another look. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Part of me is sort of hoping for a Piedmont blank front....
Another impossiblity. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do any blank fronts exist? I haven't had a chance to soak it yet to see what happens. I'll try to do so this evening.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Soaked the card for about an hour. Nothing. Still can't see a seam. It doesn't want to separate. Not sure how to proceed.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Might as well put it in a Card Saver and file it away to show to your friends and have a story.
I did learn that the typical weight of a card is approximately 0.025 ounces.
__________________
"Don't mistake activity for achievement." – John Wooden |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
James G
__________________
WTB Boston Store Cards esp Ruth, Hornsby and 1915/16 UNC Strip cards and other Boston Store's too. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB T206 Southern Leaguers PSA 3-4 (Old Mill Back) | T206CollectorVince | T206 cards B/S/T | 3 | 08-27-2021 07:38 PM |
| FS: Piedmont Southern Leaguers SGC Graded | txaggie00 | T206 cards B/S/T | 1 | 08-01-2020 07:38 AM |
| WTB: Piedmont southern leaguers | Rob D. | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 06-21-2013 02:06 PM |
| WTB Hindu Back Southern Leaguers | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-15-2008 09:45 PM |
| Hindu Back Southern Leaguers | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-03-2002 12:09 PM |