|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
This has been happening for years now. I think one auction had like 10 plus Red Cobbs. Whether or not cannibalization actually happens, I dunno, but I think you basically take that risk especially with relatively common cards.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 04-22-2024 at 09:40 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Are the 1921 Exhibit Ruths that common? I don't know the issue. I suppose if there were 3 and their grades were not similar, it might not be as bad but as a consignor I would want to know. I suppose it becomes my burden to ask.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
At least as common as "common" 1921 Exhibits, so I'd say yes. The 3 in the auction represent less than 1% of all the surviving copies.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
By contrast, the PSA pop report shows 2,609 graded red Cobbs (ignoring backs); SGC’s pop report is a major pain and I cannot tell how many red Cobbs have been graded without searching every year 1909-11 and all applicable backs. So looking at the PSA pop alone, t206 red Cobbs are 11.1x more common the 1921 exhibit Ruth’s. Let’s assume that SGC has graded 1500 red Cobbs, the difference becomes 17.5x. Based on this comparison, three 1921 Ruth exhibits is equal to 52.5, t206 red Cobbs. 52.5 red Cobbs in one auction seems excessive. Yet 3 Ruth Exhibits (especially if different grades/condition and grading companies) seems much more ok. And this is the garbage that gets posted at midnight when one cannot sleep bc they add thinking of cards! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I did win one of the 21 exhibits in REA. I thought prices had come down a lot before the auction, so wasn't entirely surprised with where they ended up, and don't necessarily think having 3 at the same time impacted the price. I think Ruth in generally has been weak this year. I thought Wagner was weak generally speaking (especially the M116), but again I think that had started before this auction. The JKA Cobb - what a card and what a price. The 51 signed Mantle, what a price. Definitely some strength in the hobby still showing, just not in the usual Ruth/Wagner channel.
__________________
for fun ways to buy cards: www.nadjacards.com Cards: https://www.flickr.com/photos/189414509@N08/albums |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Pete. Way to make me feel worse. 🤣
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
There was a modern guy buying a lot of Wagner portraits during the recent run up, I think he ended up with about 15 of them. Doesn't take much to move that needle up other than money, tends to create a false market with some of these pre-war cards.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Current state of Luka cards... | pootshwan | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 5 | 02-20-2021 07:29 PM |
| Opinions Requested on Current State of Third-Party Graders: | clydepepper | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 01-24-2021 07:00 AM |
| Thoughts on the current state of the Market? | Johnny630 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 10-30-2017 01:51 PM |
| OT? The current state of baseball in regards to card collecting | Browncow75 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 05-23-2013 05:09 PM |
| Current state of the vintage card market | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-02-2002 05:34 PM |