![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just an FYI that the hammer is 83.33% of the final price, not 80%.
For example, the hammer is $100, meaning the 20% BP is $20, and the final price (or real comp per the OP’s question) is $120. $100/$120 is 83.33%. Another example…. Hammer is $8,600, meaning the 20% BP is $1,720, and the final price is $10,320. $8,600/$10,320 = 83.33% So you do add 20% to the hammer, but the hammer ends up being 83.33% of the final price. The example above barely nets the seller what they hammer was, which would have been $833.33, in order to yield a $1000 final price. Also, nobody pays a seller fee in sports auctions anymore. Otherwise, I agree that when doing a private deal, somewhere between the “final price” comp and 83.33% thereof is fair and creates a double win, where the seller gets more than hammer and the buyer pays less than final price |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
E107 Valuation Question | quinnsryche | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-26-2019 03:29 PM |
Auction Card Quality - General Question | Nunzio11 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 11-11-2016 11:10 AM |
General Card Grading Question | CowboysGuide | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-07-2010 06:15 AM |
Blank Back T-206 Valuation/Scarcity Question | JP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 05-19-2010 08:45 PM |
D322 Wagner PSA 3 - Valuation question? | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 15 | 04-18-2008 09:34 PM |