Why is the SGC Pop Report Getting Ignored?

[Snowman]

Originally Posted by 4815162342

I am bumping this thread to mention that I attempted to bring a stack of SGC labels to the SGC booth at the National last week, and I was told that they do not update their pop reports.

Why would they? That's just creating work with zero benefit, unless it's a card with a pop count of 10 or something.

[Cory]

I'll chime in that the reason that less people use SGC pop report is it's a pain in the ass to use - to find the set then scroll through multilple pages to find the card. PSA's takes a bit to load, but at least it's all on one page once it does.

Semi-off topic - I just sent my first submission to SGC for grading - Is there zero rhyme or reason to SGC's numbering? PSA appears to be sequential, but my submitted together cards cert #'s were all over the place.

[4815162342]

Originally Posted by Snowman

Why would they? That's just creating work with zero benefit, unless it's a card with a pop count of 10 or something.

There is an enormous benefit for cards with low populations in the single digits.

[Republicaninmass]

Originally Posted by Snowman

Why would they? That's just creating work with zero benefit, unless it's a card with a pop count of 10 or something.

It takes a lot.of work to maintain Intergrity of the pop report. Nobody cares about SgC pops or set registry, even the workers. 30 seconds to delete a flip.

[calvindog]

I sent three cards in for grading two weeks ago and all three showed up on the SGC pop report after grading. I think you got wrong info.