![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you include in your master all variations listed by one of the above sources or do you limit what they may list by your own definition ? Just curious. I tend to view variations as cards intentionally changed by the manufaturer ( not always easy to tell when a change was intentional), but I collect both variations and recurring print defects ( variants) with my sets. Many recurring print defects have been given the status of "variations" by the Hobby but the process in recent times ( post SCD Catalog) is chaotic at best .
Would be happy to participate in listing in this thread any variations or varants folks have for the 72 set...or not ![]() Last edited by ALR-bishop; 09-02-2024 at 02:12 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
WTB/WTTF 1972 Topps Baseball & Football in EXMT or better |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Going back to the original post, I took a closer look at those series 1 Cubs variations.
There are 12 color combinations in the 1972 set - 2 teams for each. The Cubs shares its with the Indians. In all color combo pairs, the lettering and all its facets are identical, but not here. Look at the Indians - the areas under the letters are green. On the "correct" cubs 1st series cards, and all cubs throughout the set, the underside of the letters are yellow, which also matches the color of the thin border around the whole front of the card. Nowhere else does a card's underside coloring match the border. Look at the 1st series Cubs "errors" - the undersides of the S and C are green - this matches with the Indians colorings and contrasts with the border color. So what is going on? The "error" cards reflect 50% of what the Cubs cards SHOULD look like - green under the letters. The "correct" versions, and all other Cubs in the set are actually in 'error' in that they do not conform to the set's coloring pattern - they are in fact the ONLY team which fails to do so, so this makes it plain they are an aberration. I think the green ink was accidentally omitted from the U and B on the series 1 Cubs. Someone realized this created an issue, but rather than correct things and add green under the U and B, they erred and made the C and S yellow. Once that occurred, they kept the design yellow through the other 5 series for consistency. Reasonable? Last edited by deweyinthehall; 09-02-2024 at 02:04 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WtB 1952 topps errors and variations | Republicaninmass | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 09-04-2022 08:07 PM |
1984 topps football errors/variations/sp/DP | Rookiemonster | Football Cards Forum | 0 | 01-04-2017 01:36 PM |
2013 Topps Series One Errors/Variations | insidethewrapper | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 14 | 02-05-2013 05:49 AM |
1961 Topps errors/variations | kzgnc6 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 02-19-2010 07:07 PM |
1961 Topps Errors/Variations | kzgnc6 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 02-18-2010 08:07 PM |