![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I looked it up, and "NO" means Do Not Grade. Therefore, this does not mean that the card is counterfeit, but it means that the SGC does not grade this card. Of course, SGC does grade 1959 Topps cards. Therefore, what this probably means is that the card is Altered or just Authentic. When you do a submission to SGC, you can check the box to encapsulate the card even if it were Altered or even if the grade would only be returned as Authentic and not a number grade. If you did not check the boxes, the card could still be returned back to you with the "NO" reason.
Therefore, my guess is that your card is authentic but trimmed or altered in some way. (another possibility is it didn't meet minimum size requirements) Since you bought it raw from the dealer, it's unlikely he would accept any kind of return or refund since the card is authentic, and you were able to inspect the card personally yourself before you bought it. You can still give it a shot if it's a well known dealer. Sorry about your situation. Last edited by glchen; 09-04-2024 at 01:06 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Holding dealers responsible when raw cards don't grade the way you want them to is a slippery slope IMO. If you wanted an SGC 5 you should've bought an SGC 5.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I generally agree with you in principle. However, this is precisely why raw cards should be priced at a significant discount to their graded equivalents. If you have a card that you think would grade an SGC 5, but you did not get it graded, do not price it as the equivalent of an SGC 5. I agree of course, that it is also on the buyer to do their research, and he shouldn't pay a graded price for a raw card, but I've seen many dealers play this game of pricing cards as if they're graded but then taking no responsibility if the card doesn't actually grade the way they priced it.
__________________
195/240 1933 Goudeys (Ruth #144, #149, Gehrig #92) 131/208 T205s 46/108? Diamond Stars Last edited by jsfriedm; 09-05-2024 at 08:15 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"IMAGINE" (thank you, John Lennon)....Mickey Mantle's "rookie card" | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 06-12-2023 12:22 PM |
1957 topps #95 mickey mantle - " centered " - bvg 3 very good! | V117collector | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 06-09-2021 09:28 AM |
Fs: 1957 topps #95 mickey mantle - " centered " - sgc 35 good+ 2.5 | V117collector | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 08-29-2018 08:49 PM |
1967 Topps #150 Mickey Mantle PSA 5 EX "Dead Centered", sold | mintacular | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 08-12-2015 06:04 AM |
1959 Topps #10 Mickey Mantle SGC 70 EX+ 5.5 "Dead Centered", $PENDING | mintacular | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-16-2015 10:46 AM |