|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Absolutely not. A show isn't eBay or Amazon. WYSIWYG. You get to look over the card and decide to purchase it, and unless the seller gave you an enforceable guarantee that it would be slabbed with a numerical grade, you take the risk. If you wanted a graded card, you should have bought one.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 09-04-2024 at 05:07 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
...and eBay is turning into Amazon. I was forced to refund a buyer for a vintage item of sports memorabilia. Their reason of "I don't want this anymore" was apparently acceptable to eBay. Pardon? That's preposterous. I immediately did two things: blocked the buyer and implemented a restocking fee for returns based on ridiculous reasons.
Yes, I accept returns, but this is the first truly frivolous reason I've ever been given in nearly 30 years that I was expected to comply with. If this is what it's coming to, then my somewhat high restocking fee is the only recourse. It's spelled out in each listing, so it's on the buyer to actually read the descriptions. I can't believe that eBay filters out 95% of the content of descriptions on their app so that a buyer has to tap again in order to see it in its entirety. This is just wrong for all involved parties. Last edited by BillyCoxDodgers3B; 09-04-2024 at 05:18 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You can set up at a card show, knowingly sell trimmed cards and face absolutely no recourse. I understand your point of view and actually mostly agree - it's on the buyer - but this point of view most certainly promotes bad behavior - and has for decades. But this is what you get in a business that requires no education, has no licensing, no regulation, and no governing body. Try asking a dealer at a card show for a receipt when you buy a card at a show. The response is hilarious! I suppose you could sue the dealer, but you'd have to be able to prove that the card you sent in was the same card he sold you. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you did not select "Encapsulate if Altered," and it is, this is what it gets. I agree with what these guys are saying, if it did not hit a minimum grade, its on you; but its sounding like it was Altered, given the "NO" so the seller 100% should have full responsibility.
Grade chasing is one thing, but selling an altered card as non-altered is another. If this is the case, any respectable dealer should offer a refund or an exchange, and if applicable, should be put on blast for selling altered cards |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I will try to post a picture later, I do concede (in my mind) that this situation is not a slam dunk as to what the right resolution is.... I've also considered grading with PSA and waiting for their opinion before approaching the dealer. Another small detail is that the dealer did say they thought it was a "6" and I told them I thought more like a 5 or 5.5.... In other words, this dealer did not offer any statement like "I can't guarantee anything, I don't know how it would grade, no refunds, etc." The reason I made this post is that there are two very stark and different opinions (Adam/Exhibit Man & Smanzari/ Stefan) and wanted to hear all sides before making a decision as to how I should proceed..... Last edited by mintacular; 09-05-2024 at 09:00 AM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Did you measure the card (or compare it to a known full-sized '59 Topps example) before purchasing?
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (136/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (198/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
No, somehow I think breaking out a ruler at a show would not go over well. Here is the card in question.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Back in the 90's at Tuff-Stuff shows, I saw a few collectors break out small tailor rulers and jeweler loupes. The practice went over fine. Now that I have two cards picked up raw at those shows and graded as "evidence of trimming" and "minimum size req", I wish that I had measured the cards. That is the rub, I can't say the dealer knew, but I can't rule it out either. If a dealer objects, simply move on to another dealer.
__________________
Successful Transactions: camaro69, dhicks67, Dr Orange, Ed_Hutchinson, jingram058, LACardsGuy, perezfan |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I tend to use a card (measured at home) to compare a potential purchase to. There are plenty of dealers out there. If someone is uncomfortable with me inspecting a card for alterations, I just move on.
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (136/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (198/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not sure why not? I've done it plenty of times. Never had s dealer object. If one does it would certainly trigger a spidey sense thought...
__________________
Successful B/S/T deals with asoriano, obcbobd, x2dRich2000, eyecollectvintage, RepublicaninMass, Kwikford, Oneofthree67, jfkheat, scottglevy, whitehse, GoldenAge50s, Peter Spaeth, Northviewcats, megalimey, BenitoMcNamara, Edwolf1963, mightyq, sidepocket, darwinbulldog, jasonc, jessejames, sb1, rjackson44, bobbyw8469, quinnsryche, Carter08, philliesfan and ALBB, Buythatcard and JimmyC so far. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have a 4 inch clear ruler, and a lighted magnifier on a lanyard that I carry with me everywhere from card shows to antique stores and I apologize to no one for using it.
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
If the dealer thought it was really a 6, you can bet they would have spent the $15-$20 to grade it. I buy cards in that price range raw -- just without the expectation that they will grade anything other than Authentic or very low numerical grade.
__________________
T205 (208/208) T206 (520/520) T207 (200/200) E90-1 (120/121) E91A/B/C (99/99) 1895 Mayo (18/48) N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100) N162 Goodwin Champions (32/50) N184 Kimball Champions (38/50) Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225 www.prewarcollector.com |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Selling raw is not a license to commit fraud and omit important, relevant information. At the same time, a seller is not any more responsible for something they didn't notice either. It is why raw cards are cheaper, because they have not been placed into the holy slab that is surely correct.
Especially in person, if one examines a card, is happy with it and buys it, and then wants a refund because it didn't get the slab one wanted, that's utterly ridiculous. If one chooses to gamble, they don't get to undo the loss if they don't win. At some point one is responsible for their choices. If a seller is upset one wants to inspect a card, compare or measure it, run for the hills - they are probably committing fraud. I have never once had a potential seller object to me examining a card, because that would make it transparent there is something wrong. $700 is about the exact value of an SGC 5 1959 Topps Mantle (one sold just yesterday for $700 exactly). If one wants slabs, paying the slab price for a raw copy that may or may not get the grade (even if unaltered they may wrongly flag it, or give it a different grade rightly or wrongly) makes no sense. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Many of us old school guys would not spend anything to grade any of our cards to sell. If I have a card that you think might be a 6 (I don't think it's a 6, I think it's a nice looking card that I will sell to you for $x) then after we shake hands and make the exchange, you're on you're own. I fully 100% agree with Adam, you saw it, held it, felt it, smelled it, whatever, you agreed to a price, and if some schmuck who sells opinions tells you "it's a 2" then it's evidently a 2 and I will offer you congrats on your 2, but you want a refund? F you. Doug "middle name is Richard" Goodman |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
How did you arrive at the $x you will sell it for? Was it based on the prices of graded cards?
__________________
198/240 1933 Goudeys (Ruth #144, #149, Gehrig #92) 136/208 T205s 47/108? Diamond Stars |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
1. Some of these guys are doing shows almost every weekend. How do you expect them to remember your singular transaction of buying this Mantle from them. That card could have came from anywhere. 2. Say I as the dealer did remember the transaction; I have no way of knowing what the buyer did to the card or how it was handled before it was sent to SGC or since it was returned. And 3. Like Adam (Exhibitman) said, if you wanted a graded card you should have bought one. Once you visually inspect and pay for a card at my table you'd own it. I'd personally never sell an altered card unless it was slabbed as such, but I also wouldn't give refunds on raw cards based solely on a third party opinion. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here are the back scans. A few things of note.
The dealers are new and have claimed they don't grade cards. Based on my talking to them they did seem inexperienced and it's possible they just don't send cards for grading that often. Most of their cards were raw and they only had a few big cards, 59s including this one. In hindsight, the price I paid was a reach and I thought it had a shot at a 5.5 hence my risk. To the folks who would laugh/dismiss at even broaching a return, try to put yourself in my shoes. Again, I would not have asked for a return if the card came back less than expected and I'm not even asking for a full return. Also, I paid near comp for a 5 so it wasn't like the scenario was well under comp with a disclaimer that they aren't sure about the authenticity/ etc. of the card.... |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think you certainly CAN ask for a return, and I see no reason not to. But I do not think you are entitled to a return, and I would not be surprised if your request was denied. You freely and willingly bought the card under no duress and you had every opportunity to inspect, negotiate, and walk away.
Thought, if he won’t let you return it, maybe he will but it back for a percentage of your cost, so it mitigates your “loss”. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Current Wantlist: E92 Nadja - Bescher, Chance, Cobb, Donovan, Doolan, Dougherty, Doyle (with bat), Lobert, Mathewson, Miller (fielding), Tinker, Wagner (throwing), Zimmerman E/T Young Backrun - Need E90-1 E92 Red Crofts - Anyone especially Barry and Shean |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Saying that there is NO chance in hell I would ask for a refund or give one if I was the seller. The only exception was if there was an agreement from a regular customer/friend that a certain level of grade was guaranteed. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm so confused by the response here, I understand if OP purchased it expecting a "5" and got a "2," but this feels like they bought an altered card thinking it was unaltered. Makes me a little uneasy as I frequently buy raw cards in the BST Here. FWIW, I am a dealer and without question would offer a return/refund in this situation.
Last edited by Smanzari; 09-07-2024 at 09:12 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "IMAGINE" (thank you, John Lennon)....Mickey Mantle's "rookie card" | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 06-12-2023 12:22 PM |
| 1957 topps #95 mickey mantle - " centered " - bvg 3 very good! | V117collector | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 06-09-2021 09:28 AM |
| Fs: 1957 topps #95 mickey mantle - " centered " - sgc 35 good+ 2.5 | V117collector | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 08-29-2018 08:49 PM |
| 1967 Topps #150 Mickey Mantle PSA 5 EX "Dead Centered", sold | mintacular | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 2 | 08-12-2015 06:04 AM |
| 1959 Topps #10 Mickey Mantle SGC 70 EX+ 5.5 "Dead Centered", $PENDING | mintacular | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-16-2015 10:46 AM |