|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have to admit, I went straight to 1:06. It's interesting.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Wagner is sheet cut. It was never better than an AUTH. It should be in an AUTH now because it's sheet cut, not because it was subsequently trimmed. The focus of this story has been wrong all along IMO.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 10-17-2024 at 12:26 AM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Exactly. And PSA, complicit in the skulduggery from the word go - knew it was sheet cut and gave it an 8 anyway. What a fine opening chapter for the attitudes on grading and tone of things we find today. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-17-2024 at 05:30 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, the common understanding seems to be that Mastro took a lower grade card and trimmed it into a higher grade one, and PSA missed or overlooked the trimming. Thus, all the emphasis has been on the trimming. Not really accurate.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Right. The problem seems to be in Mastro’s insistence that he didn’t hide it (the fact it was cut) from anyone, vs. the stories that started circulating after Gretzky and McNall bought the card and PSA graded it. You can kind of see Mastro’s side of the story though. At the time he cut it from the sheet or the “oblong football” of a card he bought, there were no grading companies. Even after PSA graded the card in 1992 or whenever, there still was not this widespread focus on the deceptive practice of trimming, what a certain type of card should or should not measure to up to 1/72 of an inch - and things like that. Mastro likely wasn’t asked much about the circumstances in which he acquired the card and what he did with it before selling it to Jim Copeland in the late 80’s. There was not this cloud of eternal suspicion over things like that, as we have today with just about anything in a slab that is vintage that appears perfect or near perfect to the naked eye. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-17-2024 at 12:54 PM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Of course there was. Ironically, the rampant trimming at that time was the very marketing pitch on which PSA launched its business.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
many high grade trimmed vintage cards in older PSA holders. it's laughably sad.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
So there were "deals made" to get grades on other trimmed cards even in the early PSA days? Interesting. You always hear the argument that PSA was the savior of the wild wild west scene, where nobody knew whether cards had been altered or not. But if they were making deals from the getgo of slabbing trimmed cards with the profit motive - I guess that's just earlier than I realized.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. Last edited by jchcollins; 10-20-2024 at 01:45 PM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
PSA and grading were all about money and nothing about the hobby from the get-go. Yet people still give them business and clamor for even one grade more.
People buying commons for 1,000's just to participate in the pecker contest known as the registry are the biggest marks ever. Yeah, they may make money and have bragging rights, but the original graders must be laughing their asses off somewhere. I know I have done my part as I have freed 1500+ from their plastic prisons, even some big boys. If more would do that, the pop reports would become even more meaningless and inaccurate.
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]CampyFan39 Last edited by campyfan39; 10-22-2024 at 09:00 PM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Last edited by 4815162342; 10-22-2024 at 09:15 PM. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
I’ve cracked a couple thousand or so. For me, it’s because the card might not be available raw. In my little realm I might have to wait a few years or just never get a card if I’m picky about the container it ships in. Most people grade the decent stuff, so a lot of my scarcer material was put into my collection via cracking the slab open. If I’m looking for a poor grade T206 Mathewson, I’ll just get a raw one, but if I want a card that has ~10 copies known, it doesn’t make sense to be picky. Buy it and crack it.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Fair question.
It's very difficult to buy ungraded star cards in decent condition because dealers with nice cards price them at graded prices or higher (because everyone thinks their cards are better than they are). I can't stand paying for the grade, but it is what the hobby has deteriorated to. That is why I have not bought much in 2024.
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]CampyFan39 |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
What if it was cut using the same cutters as the day it was printed only 90yrs later? |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, if it's cut by the factory and issued as a single that is different from an individual cutting it from a sheet or strip. You can obviously do a Socratic method on it, but the hobby distinguishes.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Or at least the hobby wishes to distinguish. The fundamental problem though is that the hobby in fact cannot distinguish.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Most Notorius interview of researcher of the 1932 shooting of Bill Jurges. | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 02-05-2023 07:23 PM |
| Bill Mastro & Honus: | clydepepper | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 06-23-2015 06:11 PM |
| Bill Mastro - Great Guy | JT | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 20 | 05-30-2015 07:24 AM |
| Bill Mastro, 35 years ago | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-24-2008 07:28 AM |
| Those were the days.. Bill Mastro | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 02-06-2007 03:45 PM |