|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Fair point, i'll need to get out a heavy magnifier and see how deep the holes are and how many "layers" they go through when i can hold the card in person. Last edited by gte930d; 10-19-2024 at 12:31 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
If/when you have the chance to see the card in hand, use the magnifier to look closely at something else. Inspect the edges. When two cards (or parts thereof) are stuck together to form one, it's usually evident along the edges. It's easier to quickly spot than it is to quickly explain. Long story short...you'll see parts of two different pieces of card stock. There are exceptions, of course; however, you'll spot the majority of "Frankencard" fantasy creations this way.
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (137/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (199/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Welcome to the boards; you must have started at Georgia Tech around the same time I did, Fall of 1997.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Damn some real detectives here! Close. Summer of 97!
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Can anyone give me standard thickness of e95 cards? Going to take a micrometer over the holidays. Does anyone think the front borders look too slim at the top and sides?\ i.e. the notebook theory....? Do the "notebook cutouts" have a different printing dot matrix? ..i.e. the e95 cards def have a "dots" style of ink on the front for the person image. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think you have the best possible scenario OP. It sure looks like a period correct front and an authentic T206 back. Rebacked of course and not some misprint but an extremely poor condition cobbled together card, but the two parts do look authentic to me. Pretty funny card, “not that valuable” is up to you but even in this state a Wagner front is not worthless.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Perhaps this is what happens when someone is desperate to add Honus Wagner to their t206 set
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
could be a 1 of a kind, Id hang on to it...or sell it
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
If I remember, there was a story in the hobby back in the early 80’s about a “T206 Wagner batting” that had been found - clearly a frankencard - but someone may have created a couple of these back in the 60’s or 70’s to pass off as a new T206 pose.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
That is obviously one of a kind and worth millions...Jerry
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
That’s the weird thing here….my dad has had it at least since the very early 50’s, it came from a non collector grandfather (my great great) who obviously didn’t value them (cigar box) and from there it came from his uncle, so my great great great uncle? I can’t pretend to fathom the motivation, other than a parent appeasing a young child to fabricate something to carry around. I do that daily with my kids….
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
You’re sure you’re not referring to Heinie Wagner in the t206 set? He has a batting pose.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Diff. in value between index card vs. gover.post card 1940-1960 players | cookie | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 1 | 03-09-2019 05:50 AM |
| 2019 Net 54 Card Set Post #4 - Card front layouts! Share your opinions! | Golfcollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-07-2019 11:19 AM |
| OPINION :Pre 1980 ;b.b card, 8x10 ,team player post card | cookie | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 0 | 03-05-2017 10:20 AM |
| 1911 NY GIANTS Berger Postal Card Company Souvenir Post Card folder w/Mathewson +++ | RichardSimon | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 02-11-2014 04:52 PM |
| Post your favorite post-war football card(s) | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 11 | 10-09-2007 01:43 PM |