|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Weren't Morgan and Carew contemporaries of Grich? So that's two of the top ten of all time.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 11-18-2024 at 07:30 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I guess Tabe missed out on that fact. Or does he think Morgan and Carew were "terrible"? Last edited by cgjackson222; 11-18-2024 at 08:03 PM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Step outside the old boxes. Grich was a great, no qualifications, no apologies. Excuse me for saying so, but WAR doesn’t lie. Maybe he fell a little short in the counting stats to be a hofer, but he was a truly great player.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
WAR is the big lie. In 1965, Bob Veale had 4.0 bWAR and 8.0 fWAR. How are we supposed to know what to believe when the self-proclaimed experts disagree by 100%?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
A discrepancy in a season is your reason for dismissing the entire metric? Sure, No stat is perfect. But especially to evaluate an entire career i think WAR is hard to beat.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
When I see pitcher A has an ERA+ of 169 and a WHIP of .914 and pitcher B has an ERA+ of 123 and a WHIP of 1.278, I don't need WAR to tell me pitcher A was better than pitcher B. When WAR tells me different, then I just ignore it.
If there are large discrepancies in one season, then the sum of discrepancies for a career becomes even larger. When someone tries to argue Bobby Grich was better than other players because he has more WAR or Rich Reuschel was better than pitchers with less WAR, I am not going to believe it. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
For instance, Bobby Grich has a career bWAR of 71.1 and a career fWAR of 69.1 Not terribly far off. I'm sure you can find examples where there is a larger difference, but I am not sure that is the norm for hitting/fielding. Last edited by cgjackson222; 11-19-2024 at 10:30 AM. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maz probably shouldn't be in -- he's at the lower end of HOFers for me. But he does have 10 All-Star games and 8 Gold Gloves and he's considered among the very best fielding 2nd Basemen.
Maz was also a one-team guy and that probably inured to his benefit. The one shinning moment (his HR in the World Series) surely helped. It may have put him over the top but big moments aren't sufficient to guarantee HOF selection -Joe Carter isn't in the HOF and he hit a pretty big World Series homer too.... Maybe Carter should be in the HOF. - I recall that Joe Morgan was very unhappy when the Vet's Committee selected Maz and did something about it (Morgan was a powerful guy in Baseball and a Second Basemen) His selection led to the reconstitution of the Vets Committee. Here is an interested article about his selection and its aftermath......if someone else mentioned this already I apologize for missing it and duplicating the post....==> https://bestworst.substack.com/p/hof...az-controversy Last edited by Misunderestimated; 11-22-2024 at 02:45 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HOF Eras committee | theshleps | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-25-2023 05:36 PM |
| Hall of Fame Early Baseball Committee | CardCollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 91 | 10-17-2020 02:12 PM |
| What does the SABR Baseball Card History and Influence Research Committee do? | DaClyde | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 12-23-2016 10:44 AM |
| What does the SABR Baseball Card History and Influence Research Committee do? | DaClyde | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 5 | 12-14-2016 06:54 PM |
| SABR reviving Baseball Card Committee | Rich Klein | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-10-2016 12:33 PM |