This Probably Won't Go Anywhere, But...

[Seven]

My only issue with grading is that if a card is more valuable then it costs more to grade, which I think is preposterous. Why should it cost me more if I'm grading a 1952 Topps Mantle, then it would if I was grading a 1952 Topps Johnny Mize? The process is identical, it's not like anything should be done inherently different for one card than the other.

[ullmandds]

Originally Posted by Seven

My only issue with grading is that if a card is more valuable then it costs more to grade, which I think is preposterous. Why should it cost me more if I'm grading a 1952 Topps Mantle, then it would if I was grading a 1952 Topps Johnny Mize? The process is identical, it's not like anything should be done inherently different for one card than the other.

agree...this is my #1 gripe with TPG.

[mq711]

Originally Posted by ullmandds

agree...this is my #1 gripe with TPG.

I would hope they put more of an effort into grading and authenticating a card worth thousands than they do one worth less than a hundred; though I have no idea if the use more resources for this or not.

[campyfan39]

I detest grading and crack them all out if I buy one or get it in a trade. PSA is the worst. Aside from being built on a complete lie with the first card, they are incompetent.
Wildly inconsistent grading.

Last week, I sold a card on eBay. It was over 250, so my funds were "on hold" while they "authenticated" it. A week after arriving at the authenticator, I had heard nothing. I got in touch with someone and they were very nice. They said the authenticator noticed a slight stain on the back that I did not say in my description. This is despite my extra large photos of the back and there being no stain!
They said they contacted the buyer and he said he "knew the condition of the card to ship it to him and stop f'ing around so he can get it before Christmas!"

They are supposedly going to authenticate it now. So, there was not even a question of whether it was authentic. Now they are questioning stains and who knows what else. When I bought the card years ago, it was PSA3 with no qualifiers.

Makes me furious

[Fred]

In reference to post #74, I didn't realize ebay or PSA would debate the grade of a card they already slabbed, that's just crazy. What are they going to do, say it's the wrong grade and shoot themselves in the foot (assuming the card is in a PSA slab)? Yes, that would be annoying. It'd be funny as hell if the authenticator determined the card was trimmed and the flip is incorrect (should be an A rather than numerical grade - probably zero chance of that occurring).

The following is from ebay:

The seller ships your card to the authentication facility, where PSA inspects every item. For ungraded cards, PSA experts verify authenticity through a multi-point inspection, and then carefully review listing details for accuracy. For graded cards, PSA experts authenticate each case and label. No regrading is performed.

It would be interesting to see if PSA would start offering grading services for ungraded cards during the "authentication" process. Pay the fee, the card is slabbed, registered, and shipped. I wonder what the turn around time would be for that service.

[raulus]

Originally Posted by Fred

In reference to post #74, I didn't realize ebay or PSA would debate the grade of a card they already slabbed, that's just crazy.

If I understood campy right, it sounds like he cracked it out long ago, and is reselling it now. But happens to remember the slab it used to reside in. So the current authentication is authenticating a raw card.

Of course, I may have misinterpreted the situation entirely.

[campyfan39]

You are correct. I don't have any slabbed cards and any that I obtain I crack out. when i bought this card a long tie ago, it was a PS3 with no qualifier.

My contention is that they have had the card since Tuesday morning and have yet to "authenticate" it. I was able to get someone on the phone today to find out what was going on. There was not any question that the card is authentic, but they claim there was a "light stain" on the back that was not specifically listed in the description. There is no stain.

The messaged the buyer and he said he reviewed all of the large pictures I provided and he wanted them to hurry up and ship him the card.

So I guess if you list any card more than $250 on ebay, just having 8 pictures is not enough. You have to inspect it and list any possible flaw in the description. I may just stick to the BST and facebook groups when I have something to sell.

Originally Posted by raulus

If I understood campy right, it sounds like he cracked it out long ago, and is reselling it now. But happens to remember the slab it used to reside in. So the current authentication is authenticating a raw card.

Of course, I may have misinterpreted the situation entirely.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by Seven

My only issue with grading is that if a card is more valuable then it costs more to grade, which I think is preposterous. Why should it cost me more if I'm grading a 1952 Topps Mantle, then it would if I was grading a 1952 Topps Johnny Mize? The process is identical, it's not like anything should be done inherently different for one card than the other.

You know the answer.

[Seven]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

You know the answer.

Of course, Peter. I think we all do. It just doesn't sit right with me. I know the rose tinted nostalgia glasses only highlight the good and not the bad, but the Hobby was in a significantly better place in terms of being just a hobby, years ago.

[butchie_t]

Originally Posted by Seven

My only issue with grading is that if a card is more valuable then it costs more to grade, which I think is preposterous. Why should it cost me more if I'm grading a 1952 Topps Mantle, then it would if I was grading a 1952 Topps Johnny Mize? The process is identical, it's not like anything should be done inherently different for one card than the other.

Getting a loan from a loan shark is more reasonable than having to cough up the kind of coin for grading a 52 Mantle. That is freaking highway robbery.

Butch Turner

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by Seven

My only issue with grading is that if a card is more valuable then it costs more to grade, which I think is preposterous. Why should it cost me more if I'm grading a 1952 Topps Mantle, then it would if I was grading a 1952 Topps Johnny Mize? The process is identical, it's not like anything should be done inherently different for one card than the other.

Does an art restorer charge more to restore the Mona Lisa than some random painting in your living room? It's not about the exact action they are performing, it's that they are being entrusted with the possession and care of a very valuable item and have to take that in consideration in pricing. Potential liability is a part of a business's overhead. And all overhead is baked into the pricing structure. The only other way would be to raise grading costs for every card and spread the cost out. But that would be too big a pill for their average consumer to swallow, so they won't do it. Their bread and butter is grading a million base cards a month, not 5 52 Mantles.

[Seven]

Originally Posted by OhioLawyerF5

Does an art restorer charge more to restore the Mona Lisa than some random painting in your living room? It's not about the exact action they are performing, it's that they are being entrusted with the possession and care of a very valuable item and have to take that in consideration in pricing. Potential liability is a part of a business's overhead. And all overhead is baked into the pricing structure. The only other way would be to raise grading costs for every card and spread the cost out. But that would be too big a pill for their average consumer to swallow, so they won't do it. Their bread and butter is grading a million base cards a month, not 5 52 Mantles.

In my opinion this comparison should be like comparing apples to oranges. Our hobby should not reflect what goes on the art world. But that's neither here nor there. I know Why it costs more, I'm saying it shouldn't, it's not fair to the average collector.

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by Seven

In my opinion this comparison should be like comparing apples to oranges. Our hobby should not reflect what goes on the art world. But that's neither here nor there. I know Why it costs more, I'm saying it shouldn't, it's not fair to the average collector.

Remove the art restorer analogy. You are getting caught up in it. I wasn't treating cards like artwork. I just randomly chose a service where the same action performed costs different depending on how valuable the item they are performing it on. It could literally be any service. It costs more to change the oil on a Lambourgini than it does a Chevy. If you know why it costs more, then you wouldn't say it shouldn't. It costs more to the consumer because it costs more to PSA. Simple as that. And I just explained why it is actually more fair to the average collector. The average collector isn't sending 52 Mantles to get graded. If they spread the cost of risk for those grading 52 Mantles across the board, the average consumer would be paying $99 to grade a base card instead of $20.

[packs]

My collection is exclusively made up of collector grade cards. I don't really run into registry issues and I think people who do are doing it to themselves. I have no issue with TPA's and appreciate having my cards in a slab.

[Gorditadogg]

Originally Posted by OhioLawyerF5

Does an art restorer charge more to restore the Mona Lisa than some random painting in your living room? It's not about the exact action they are performing, it's that they are being entrusted with the possession and care of a very valuable item and have to take that in consideration in pricing. Potential liability is a part of a business's overhead. And all overhead is baked into the pricing structure. The only other way would be to raise grading costs for every card and spread the cost out. But that would be too big a pill for their average consumer to swallow, so they won't do it. Their bread and butter is grading a million base cards a month, not 5 52 Mantles.

I would also hope the person cleaning your random living room painting is not the same guy working on the Mona Lisa.

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

[G1911]

I have cracked out north of 1,000 graded cards, submitted 0 (if I was selling something high grade nice, I might do it because it might be more profitable, but there is 0 point in grading until you sell), and have ~75 or so in slabs now largely because I've had to promise sellers I will not crack them out in order to get them from people who know my penchant to liberate everything. I agree it is a stupid game, paying money for an appeal to authority to an unknown person at a company who is demonstrably incompetent over and over and over and over again. It's stupid, but if it makes money people will do anything, so it isn't going to change and while it can be fodder for some amusement it's not worth getting angry over or telling your buyers to fuck off for not paying graded prices for your raw cards or that you don't give a flying fuck what they think or want. Not many deals are closed for anything that way. You can't control other people, nor should anyone, so let them do what they want, have a laugh when PSA does something funny, and collect how you like.

[Balticfox]

Originally Posted by G1911

I have cracked out north of 1,000 graded cards, submitted 0 ... and have ~75 or so in slabs now largely because I've had to promise sellers I will not crack them out in order to get them from people who know my penchant to liberate everything.

Huh?! I don't understand. Why would the seller be the least bit interested in you cracking the card out of its slab?