New York Times Leaf Article

Aquarian Sports Cards · #1 12-20-2024, 09:09 PM

I would argue there are a LOT more ungraded copies than people think. We've graded two Paige cards from original owner collections in 5 years and we're pretty small potatoes.

Snowman · #2 12-20-2024, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards

I would argue there are a LOT more ungraded copies than people think. We've graded two Paige cards from original owner collections in 5 years and we're pretty small potatoes.

I would argue that getting two raw Paiges to grade graduates to you at least medium potatoes land.

Aquarian Sports Cards · #3 12-21-2024, 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman

I would argue that getting two raw Paiges to grade graduates to you at least medium potatoes land.

LOL so I got that going for me, which is nice.

raulus · #4 12-21-2024, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards

LOL so I got that going for me, which is nice.

Time to put this testimonial on your marketing materials. �Certified medium potatoes!�

Aquarian Sports Cards · #5 12-21-2024, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus

Time to put this testimonial on your marketing materials. �Certified medium potatoes!�

I actually laughed out loud.

Balticfox · #6 12-21-2024, 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards

I would argue there are a LOT more ungraded copies than people think.

I agree. I believe the number of ungraded cards in private collections still dwarves the number of graded specimens.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman

Notable combined PSA/SGC/BVG pop counts from the set:

Short Prints:
Satchel Paige 279 (193 PSA)
Bob Feller 199 (156 PSA)
George Kell 148 (111 PSA)
Dom DiMaggio 171 (124 PSA)
Larry Doby 215 (162 PSA)

Non-SPs
Ted Williams 2202 (1471 PSA)
Babe Ruth 2328 (1595 PSA)
Joe DiMaggio 2246 (1501 PSA)
Jackie Robinson 2676 (1849 PSA)
Stan Musial 1968 (1339 PSA)

Actually, could you provide comparative numbers for the topps 1952 Mickey Mantle card to put the above figures into perspective?

Snowman · #7 12-21-2024, 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox

I agree. I believe the number of ungraded cards in private collections still dwarves the number of graded specimens.

Sure, for something like 1962 Topps Sandy Koufax, that's obviously true. But it's certainly not true for T206 Eddie Plank or even 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson.

The percentage of graded vs ungraded copies of any particular card is largely a function of its value. The number of ungraded T206 Wagners still floating around is likely very close to zero these days. Perhaps there are one or three yet to be discovered, but the likelihood that there are dozens of them sitting around in attics is almost certainly zero.

There are still some collectors out there who, as a point of pride or preference, like to keep their prized cards like 52 Mantles and 48 Leaf Paiges raw, but there aren't very many of them left in terms of percentage of the population. And every time those cards come to market, they still get graded (or regraded). And any time you have a vintage card that is so valuable that it must be graded regardless of condition in order for it to be transactable on the market for anything other than pennies on the dollar of its true value, you can be pretty sure that the pop reports for that card reflect something close to it's true population, if not slightly exaggerating it due to resubmissions (which are MUCH higher than most people here realize). So this would work for something like estimating the true population for 52 Mantles, but definitely not for estimating the 53 Mantle population (there are other sampling techniques we could use to estimate that, but that's another discussion and one I'd prefer not to get into here).

And while yes, I agree with those who say there are still plenty of 52 Mantles out there to be graded, the reality is that those numbers are dwarfed by the number of copies that are/were cracked and resubmitted.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balticfox

Actually, could you provide comparative numbers for the topps 1952 Mickey Mantle card to put the above figures into perspective?

1952 Topps Mickey Mantle = 2863 total pop (2040 PSA, 673 SGC, 147 BVG, 3 CGC)

The 52 Topps Mantle likely has a very similar print run as the 48 Leaf Jackie Robinson. Maybe 10% or so higher at most.

Peter_Spaeth · #8 12-21-2024, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman

Sure, for something like 1962 Topps Sandy Koufax, that's obviously true. But it's certainly not true for T206 Eddie Plank or even 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson.

The percentage of graded vs ungraded copies of any particular card is largely a function of its value. The number of ungraded T206 Wagners still floating around is likely very close to zero these days. Perhaps there are one or three yet to be discovered, but the likelihood that there are dozens of them sitting around in attics is almost certainly zero.

There are still some collectors out there who, as a point of pride or preference, like to keep their prized cards like 52 Mantles and 48 Leaf Paiges raw, but there aren't very many of them left in terms of percentage of the population. And every time those cards come to market, they still get graded (or regraded). And any time you have a vintage card that is so valuable that it must be graded regardless of condition in order for it to be transactable on the market for anything other than pennies on the dollar of its true value, you can be pretty sure that the pop reports for that card reflect something close to it's true population, if not slightly exaggerating it due to resubmissions (which are MUCH higher than most people here realize). So this would work for something like estimating the true population for 52 Mantles, but definitely not for estimating the 53 Mantle population (there are other sampling techniques we could use to estimate that, but that's another discussion and one I'd prefer not to get into here).

And while yes, I agree with those who say there are still plenty of 52 Mantles out there to be graded, the reality is that those numbers are dwarfed by the number of copies that are/were cracked and resubmitted.

1952 Topps Mickey Mantle = 2863 total pop (2040 PSA, 673 SGC, 147 BVG, 3 CGC)

The 52 Topps Mantle likely has a very similar print run as the 48 Leaf Jackie Robinson. Maybe 10% or so higher at most.

After three and a half decades of grading, IMO this romantic notion of countless pristine raw collections in the hands of mostly unknown old timers is largely a myth.

Pat R · #9 12-21-2024, 09:40 AM

All of the factual evidence that I've seen shows the short print distribution in states that border Canada west of Pennsylvania.

I have posted this ad before from a May 12 1949 Spokane Washington newspaper. The ad states 6 cards in a pack and that's how many cards were in the packs in the Rosen short print find from Michigan all of the evidence on the first series is 5 cards in a pack.

Leaf Baseball Spokane_Chronicle_Thu__May_12__1949_.jpg

tjisonline · #10 12-21-2024, 04:46 PM

My guess..

Taking all the crack and resubs into account, more likely the true number of graded 1952T Mick's are closer to the number of 52T Jackie graded (1968) than the current 2862. �and the true number of 1952 T jackie cards graded are prob closer to Bobby Thompson's 1175 than 1968 (as his card isn�t being cracked much).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snowman

Sure, for something like 1962 Topps Sandy Koufax, that's obviously true. But it's certainly not true for T206 Eddie Plank or even 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson.

The percentage of graded vs ungraded copies of any particular card is largely a function of its value.

And while yes, I agree with those who say there are still plenty of 52 Mantles out there to be graded, the reality is that those numbers are dwarfed by the number of copies that are/were cracked and resubmitted.

1952 Topps Mickey Mantle = 2863 total pop (2040 PSA, 673 SGC, 147 BVG, 3 CGC)

The 52 Topps Mantle likely has a very similar print run as the 48 Leaf Jackie Robinson. Maybe 10% or so higher at most.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
New York Times Article on the Scandal	STL1944	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	4	06-14-2019 11:37 AM
Major "New York Times' Article on Jefferson Burdick	GregMitch34	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	10	05-22-2012 07:20 PM
NY Times Article on WS Programs	ibuysportsephemera	Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used	0	10-19-2011 02:27 PM
New York Times article about a Josh Gibson documentary - interesting reading	RichardSimon	Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used	3	10-19-2009 05:07 PM
Japan Times article	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	39	01-09-2002 04:44 PM