College football playoffs

[Peter_Spaeth]

I loathe the way overtime works now.

[TUM301]

Damn this ND-Georgia game is a slug fest.

[ClementeFanOh]

TUM- It is indeed! Tight game, like it should be.

Trent King

[jayshum]

Top 4 seeds all lost in the quarterfinals. None were actually favored in their games so maybe not too surprising.

[Shoeless Moe]

3-1/2 weeks off for a team is ridiculous, they lose all their end of season momentum.

So many things to fix and hopefully they will.

8 Playoff games so far and only 1 of 8 was close late in the 4th.

7 of 8 games were over with 5 minutes to play.

The highest seeded team left (8) is the favorite to win it all. Yep, they got some fixing to do.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by Shoeless Moe

3-1/2 weeks off for a team is ridiculous, they lose all their end of season momentum.

So many things to fix and hopefully they will.

8 Playoff games so far and only 1 of 8 was close late in the 4th.

7 of 8 games were over with 5 minutes to play.

The highest seeded team left (8) is the favorite to win it all. Yep, they got some fixing to do.

The Penn State - Boise State game was closer than the final score indicated, but overall I agree that most of the games were non-competitive. Hopefully the semifinals and championship will be better.

[Balticfox]

Interesting! This could be Notre Dame's year.

[nolemmings]

Originally Posted by Shoeless Moe

3-1/2 weeks off for a team is ridiculous, they lose all their end of season momentum.

So many things to fix and hopefully they will.

It's not really the long layoff that is noticeable to me, since that historically has been true-- all teams end their regular season or conference championship the end of November or early December than play the "big" games around January 1st.
Instead it seems that a team with a game under its belt a week or so prior is more tuned to go than one that had a bye. Kind of a rhythm thing. We of course have a small sample size since this is the first year, but as I posted before, it seems better if there are no byes and we move to 16 teams. You know they are going to expand this thing at some point anyway.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by nolemmings

It's not really the long layoff that is noticeable to me, since that historically has been true-- all teams end their regular season or conference championship the end of November or early December than play the "big" games around January 1st.
Instead it seems that a team with a game under its belt a week or so prior is more tuned to go than one that had a bye. Kind of a rhythm thing. We of course have a small sample size since this is the first year, but as I posted before, it seems better if there are no byes and we move to 16 teams. You know they are going to expand this thing at some point anyway.

None of the top 4 seeds were favored in the quarterfinals. Seeding played a part in that since many didn't think Boise State and Arizona State deserved to be seeded high enough to earn byes. Georgia was playing without their starting quarterback. Oregon was playing the team, Ohio State, many considered to have a good chance to win the championship before they lost to Michigan. In reality, none of the 4 "upsets" were really upsets based on the odds, just on the seeds.