 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
01-22-2025, 11:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
1955 Valo
I had this one as a result of the lower right bar being somewhat cut off, like Minarcin, only less so.
One of these has the .280 BA without the dot on the reverse. Last edited by Sliphorn; 01-22-2025 at 11:41 AM. Reason: Adding pnoto 
|
|
#3
01-22-2025, 02:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thomas--good to hear from you. My defective Valo is llike yours and is missing the dot before 280 on the back as well
|
|
#4
01-22-2025, 05:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
For 145 Valo, I did not know (thank you guys) about the front name box defect.
My version of .280 and 280 are both fully printed in the red name box. A smidgeon of the corner of the "2" in the "280" version is missing, if you look closely. Last edited by G1911; 01-22-2025 at 05:56 PM.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 06:05 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 11:52 AM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 04:32 PM |
| Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 07:23 PM |
Hybrid Mode
