Poll Should GA disclose that the PSA 6.5 and SGC MIN SIZE Dimaggios are same card? - Net54baseball.com Forums
  NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

View Poll Results: Should GA disclose that the PSA 6.5 WWG Dimaggio is the same card as the SGC MIN SIZE
Yes 104 50.73%
No 101 49.27%
Voters: 205. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2025, 10:28 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioLawyerF5 View Post
To me, after reading both threads, this entire issue is based on a significant misunderstanding of grading. Min size does not mean evidence of trimming (the opposite, in fact), and min size is NOT an objective standard. Once you understand those two points, disclosing the SGC grade becomes irrelevant. It was clear from the first thread that Peter was under the mistaken impression (based on an incorrect auction description) that min size meant there could be evidence of trimming. Then later in the thread, he specifically alluded to his belief that min size was objective. Neither of those is true, and resulted in two threads based on the same misunderstandings.
MIN SIZE may not be APPLIED consistently, but surely in conception it is not subjective -- that is, the grader THINKS it looks small. It's an objective standard, albeit not applied consistently apparently. And I continue to think where a change of flip has brought about a 6 figure difference in market value, the prior assessment is material. And if it isn't, it can be disclosed and people can disregard it. I would almost always err on the side of disclosure, and I don't understand why people are working so hard to justify non-disclosure.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby:
No consequences.
Stuff trumps all.
The flip is the commoodity.
Animal Farm grading.

Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 01-28-2025 at 10:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2025, 10:42 AM
OhioLawyerF5's Avatar
OhioLawyerF5 OhioLawyerF5 is offline
Tim0thy J0nes
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
MIN SIZE may not be APPLIED consistently, but surely in conception it is not subjective -- that is, the grader THINKS it looks small. It's an objective standard, albeit not applied consistently apparently. And I continue to think where a change of flip has brought about a 6 figure difference in market value, the prior assessment is material. And if it isn't, it can be disclosed and people can disregard it. I would almost always err on the side of disclosure, and I don't understand why people are working so hard to justify non-disclosure.
It's not objective because what consitutes too far a variance from the standard varies based on who (or what company) is doing the evaluation. Yes, looking at a ruler provides an objective number. Determining whether that number is too small to warrant a number grade is a subjective endeavor.

That said, I am on the side that MIN SIZE shouldn't be a thing. If a card is trimmed, it's altered. If a card came from the factory a particular size, it should be graded with a number grade. I'm fine if you believe it should be considered a defect or flaw, and the grade affected accordingly, but an unaltered card should get a number grade.

Which is why I don't see it any different than cracking a 5 and getting a 7. If that doesn't need disclosed because it's just two opinions, than an unaltered card that goes from MIN SIZE to a number shouldn't either. The card is simply sold as it currently sits, with whatever third party's opinion it has attached to it.

Last edited by OhioLawyerF5; 01-28-2025 at 10:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2025, 10:51 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34,267
Default

I think we would agree that the grading companies need to do a better explanation of MIN SIZE, and that whoever wrote up the Goldin description the first time really hurt the consignor.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby:
No consequences.
Stuff trumps all.
The flip is the commoodity.
Animal Farm grading.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-28-2025, 11:04 AM
OhioLawyerF5's Avatar
OhioLawyerF5 OhioLawyerF5 is offline
Tim0thy J0nes
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
I think we would agree that the grading companies need to do a better explanation of MIN SIZE, and that whoever wrote up the Goldin description the first time really hurt the consignor.
100%. Whoever wrote that description not only has no clue, but definitely hurt the consignor.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Goldin Auctions Bigcatbaseball Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T 14 11-07-2022 07:42 AM
Goldin Auctions.Are they down mrreality68 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 37 03-07-2021 11:31 PM
Goldin Auctions down...again... HOF Auto Rookies Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 31 07-20-2020 09:28 PM
Goldin Auctions down? Edwolf1963 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 24 01-29-2017 10:53 PM
Goldin Auctions Lot 269 Boomer Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used 8 02-02-2014 01:48 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:24 PM.


ebay GSB