SUBJECT: BEWARE Steve Verkman, Keith Vari, Leland’s, Clean Sweep & Paragon auctions

[G1911]

Originally Posted by jayshum

The OP is now sending me PMs telling more of his side of what happened. Is anyone else receiving similar messages? I would encourage him to post in the thread for everyone to see.

Yes, I believe he is having issues with the upload limitations.

[jayshum]

Originally Posted by G1911

Yes, I believe he is having issues with the upload limitations.

He didn't tell me about any problems he had posting so I don't know why he chose to PM me. Did he tell you anything more?

[G1911]

Originally Posted by jayshum

He didn't tell me about any problems he had posting so I don't know why he chose to PM me. Did he tell you anything more?

I'll DM you.

[RCMcKenzie]

I would not sell my collection for a 60/40 split, but I can see where someone would. The whole thing of selling is a lot of work. I used to sell on eBay. Time value of money. Did my boxing card friend Greg argue both sides of this, or did I misread the thread?

[G1911]

Originally Posted by RCMcKenzie

I would not sell my collection for a 60/40 split, but I can see where someone would. The whole thing of selling is a lot of work. I used to sell on eBay. Time value of money. Did my boxing card friend Greg argue both sides of this, or did I misread the thread?

You misread the thread, 'friend'.

I am consistently against hiding inconvenient threads and lying, and also consistently in favor of evidence. That is not in the ballpark of a contradiction. To believe a contract does X or Y, one should....look at the contract. If there is an alleged usurious bill in violation of the contract, one should... look at the contract and the bill. Apparently this is not common sense and is problematic for some folks agendas.

[Mark17]

Originally Posted by G1911

Yes, I believe he is having issues with the upload limitations.

Originally Posted by G1911

You misread the thread, 'friend'.

I am consistently against hiding inconvenient threads and lying, and also consistently in favor of evidence. That is not in the ballpark of a contradiction. To believe a contract does X or Y, one should....look at the contract. If there is an alleged usurious bill in violation of the contract, one should... look at the contract and the bill. Apparently this is not common sense and is problematic for some folks agendas.

Since this thread with 200+ posts has ground to a stop due to lack of new evidence, is there any chance someone can assist the OP with his apparent upload issues? My popcorn is getting stale.

[Leon]

I am consistently against idiots.
I spoke to the OP the 2nd day all of this trash was posted. I knew then that it's a big nothing-burger and should in no way affect the auction closing the next day. That is why it was moved. Plus it is explicitly against the rules to do what the OP did as his first post. It could have been deleted and that would have probably been the right thing to do.
If I were the AH I might just sue the OP. He knew exactly what he was doing and waffles back and forth on all kinds of stuff. He is totally in the wrong here, imo.
He had already spoken to lawyers, he told me, and no one would take it. That is because the whole thing is a bunch of crap. Lawyers will take good cases, most times.

And if I hear "evidentiary" again I might explode.

Originally Posted by G1911

You misread the thread, 'friend'.

I am consistently against hiding inconvenient threads and lying, and also consistently in favor of evidence. That is not in the ballpark of a contradiction. To believe a contract does X or Y, one should....look at the contract. If there is an alleged usurious bill in violation of the contract, one should... look at the contract and the bill. Apparently this is not common sense and is problematic for some folks agendas.

[Republicaninmass]

Is our free counselor in chief going to get the "items" back and sent to "the other auction house" for a "100%" commission?


We want to know!

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Leon

I am consistently against idiots.
I spoke to the OP the 2nd day all of this trash was posted. I knew then that it's a big nothing-burger and should in no way affect the auction closing the next day. That is why it was moved. Plus it is explicitly against the rules to do what the OP did as his first post. It could have been deleted and that would have probably been the right thing to do.
If I were the AH I might just sue the OP. He knew exactly what he was doing and waffles back and forth on all kinds of stuff. He is totally in the wrong here, imo.
He had already spoken to lawyers, he told me, and no one would take it. That is because the whole thing is a bunch of crap. Lawyers will take good cases, most times.

And if I hear "evidentiary" again I might explode.

Yes, I'm the stupidest and worst man to ever live because I support an evidentiary (hopefully nobody explodes from suffering this brief encounter with basic logic) basis for things. Now can you point out where I 'made crap up' and lied while observing the history of doing this for Lelands? Or is that still a no go because your smear was untrue, you just don't like my opinion?