 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-14-2025, 08:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” 
|
|
#2
02-14-2025, 08:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I tentatively have Hal Woodeshick above Dick McAuliffe for a few reasons, it appears to be a yellow card under Woodeshick, the card above McAuliffe needs to be a 3x which Woodeshick is, and that space is currently open. With Stanky being at the top of a column above Bearnarth-G Banks-L Green that means there are mistakes in the other columns so nothing is set.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 02-14-2025 at 08:47 PM. Reason: Missed a word
|
|
#3
02-14-2025, 10:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I figured out the flaw and have completed the 77 card layout. Joe Gibbon of the Giants is the card under Dick McAuliffe and not a Twin/Red, it is most likely a color shift on the Gibbon showing the blue or less likely it's sun faded. I will send dewey the info and hopefully he can whip up a virtual sheet before too long
 .
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#4
02-15-2025, 10:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK - I will get to it in a couple weeks probably - I think I still owe you a 1958 series.
I am going to double check the 1966 layout against all the images I have stored away - sort of a "from scratch" thing - as I work on it. It just sort of feels like we've reached a conclusion pretty quickly for such an impossible series.
|
|
#6
02-15-2025, 11:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 .
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#8
02-15-2025, 03:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1966 series 6
Quote:
There have been a few more miscuts that have shown up recently, but as far as "impossible,", I know the cliff and I have worked on this for over a year and a half.
|
|
#9
02-22-2025, 05:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
After a lot of detective work by Cliff, Kevvy and myself, here is a possible layout for both 1966 6th series slits.
|
|
#10
02-23-2025, 07:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
1966 topps series 6
Very nice, but I think Roznovsky & Podres have to be flipped. Also, as an aside, this is one of the few times where a checklist was on a 4x row. The editors at Topps must have been asleep with such strange series printing.
Last edited by Kevvyg1026; 02-27-2025 at 06:29 AM. Reason: adding comment
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 05:25 PM |
| FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 10:55 PM |
| FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 09:13 PM |
| 1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 08:42 AM |
| 1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 02:09 PM |
Hybrid Mode
