B/S/T Etiquette

[jingram058]

Originally Posted by Fred

Straight forward scenario/question:

Seller has item for sale in BST.

Buyer A makes the offer to pay asking price and agrees to all ship methods, etc.

Seller sends confirmation the item is sold to Buyer A.

A couple hours later, the seller receives correspondence indicating Buyer B is interested and seller tells Buyer B, "sorry, it's sold". Buyer B ups the offer by 20%. Seller decides they'd want more cash and will take the offer.

QUESTION - How would you feel as Buyer A? I read what the lawyers are writing and the word "contract" comes up. Is there really a legally binding contract based on a couple emails?

In my book, the seller's a butthead for backing out for any reason. I wouldn't pursue it further, just avoid the seller. I wouldn't create a post indicating the seller's a butthead, but fact is, the seller is a butthead if they renege on a deal (for just about any reason). Yes, it's the sellers item and prerogative to do whatever they choose, but if you have an agreement, honor it.

If a seller did that, then that can eat fecal matter and die as far as I am concerned.

However, none of the deals I personally have been involved in here on net54 have been anywhere like that.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by jingram058

If a seller did that, then that can eat fecal matter and die as far as I am concerned.

However, none of the deals I personally have been involved in here on net54 have been anywhere like that.

Death seems a bit severe for taking a higher offer

[BRoberts]

Originally Posted by G1911

Death seems a bit severe for taking a higher offer

Penalty of death applies only to a seller of a slabbed card.

[Mark17]

Originally Posted by G1911

Death seems a bit severe for taking a higher offer

Mr. Monk would say eating fecal matter would be worse...

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Mark17

Mr. Monk would say eating fecal matter would be worse...

Perhaps this can be the next contentious thread, debating whether being forced to eat shit or being killed is the appropriate punishment for taking a higher offer after a lower one was accepted, and which is worse to suffer. OP’s take seems entirely reasonable now that the bar of comparison has been lowered to this.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by G1911

Perhaps this can be the next contentious thread, debating whether being forced to eat shit or being killed is the appropriate punishment for taking a higher offer after a lower one was accepted, and which is worse to suffer. OP’s take seems entirely reasonable now that the bar of comparison has been lowered to this.

The expression contemplates both, sequentially.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

The expression contemplates both, sequentially.

I am aware.

[JollyElm]

Originally Posted by Mark17

Mr. Monk would say eating fecal matter would be worse...

You're my new favorite person! Absolutely love Monk!!