B/S/T Etiquette

[gregndodgers]

Originally Posted by OhioLawyerF5

As a lawyer, I stand by mine 100%. There is no court that will find a post of a card for sale with a price and how payment is accepted, that doesn't express an intent to be bound to the first to accept the offer, constitutes a binding offer on the part of the seller. I provided you the most significant cases on the issue, including those that support the proposition that an invitation to treat can become an offer under the right circumstances. And none of them support your claim. Like I said, provide a case that provides otherwise. Those cases are very fact specific. And these aren't those facts.

I have zero desire to spend any more time on this issue. However, as a final statement, if anyone deviates from what I have stated above, they are inviting a lawsuit, particularly when high dollar value cards are involved.

[gabrinus]

*

[G1911]

The real lesson is to just not trade or sell cards to lawyers

[rich699]

Who told you to put the balm on? Do you even know what a balm is?

[Section103]

Originally Posted by G1911

The real lesson is to just not trade or sell cards to lawyers

Bravo Greg.

[OhioLawyerF5]

Originally Posted by gregndodgers

I have zero desire to spend any more time on this issue. However, as a final statement, if anyone deviates from what I have stated above, they are inviting a lawsuit, particularly when high dollar value cards are involved.

Anyone with a 50 dollar filing fee can file a lawsuit. There is zero percent chance a court will find in their favor under the facts presented here. You are simply wrong on the law. Wouldn't be the first lawyer I've encountered who is wrong and can't support their position by anything other than a "because I said so" argument.

On the other hand, I provided the relevant case law, quoted the standards, and showed how they don't apply at all to this situation.