Joe B. has sued Leland's (follow up to closed "beware" thread)

[paul]

Just to be completely off-point and irrelevant, I have to say that Steve Verkman's signature is amazing. It's at the very end of his affidavit linked in a previous post. (I tried to copy the signature directly into this post, but failed).

[Lorewalker]

Originally Posted by paul

just to be completely off-point and irrelevant, i have to say that steve verkman's signature is amazing. It's at the very end of his affidavit linked in a previous post. (i tried to copy the signature directly into this post, but failed).

lol.

[tiger8mush]

Originally Posted by paul

Just to be completely off-point and irrelevant, I have to say that Steve Verkman's signature is amazing. It's at the very end of his affidavit linked in a previous post. (I tried to copy the signature directly into this post, but failed).

Sig shown ...

[raulus]

Originally Posted by tiger8mush

Sig shown ...

Could easily be mistaken for the Chinese character for person.

And maybe that’s the message. He’s just as human as the rest of us.

[Peter_Spaeth]

My uncle out in Texas
Can't even write his name
He signs his checks with Xs
But they cash them just the same.

[Vintage Vern]

It looks like the same signature from the poster that said he won a 40 grand Jordan card that never got delivered, but was signed for.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction denied. Evidently there was an agreement designating New Jersey as the sole forum for dispute resolution. This means the NY suit likely will be dismissed.

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nys...REr0QK0FCT7A==

[puckpaul]

Par for the course with this plaintiff. Not a serious guy.

[nolemmings]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction denied. Evidently there was an agreement designating New Jersey as the sole forum for dispute resolution. This means the NY suit likely will be dismissed.

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nys...REr0QK0FCT7A==

A lot of lawyering go on here. Defendant argued in NJ that NY case should proceed because it was filed first, then argued in NY that the NJ court is the proper forum. NJ court stayed its action pending the outcome in NY.
The decision to not have the matter proceed on parallel tracks is proper, if only to avoid potential inconsistent or contradictory results. So now we turn to New Jersey, which may or may not have publicly available filings.
Nothing of substance accomplished yet that can be seen of record, as far as I know anyway.

EDITED TO ADD I should say that there has been no decision on the merits of the claims. However, the NJ court already imposed injunctive relief. As I read it, defendant argued that they pulled lots from their auction and none are about to be sold at this time.